File CVE-2019-1000020.patch of Package libarchive.9866

commit 8312eaa576014cd9b965012af51bc1f967b12423
Author: Daniel Axtens <>
Date:   Tue Jan 1 17:10:49 2019 +1100

    iso9660: Fail when expected Rockridge extensions is missing
    A corrupted or malicious ISO9660 image can cause read_CE() to loop
    read_CE() calls parse_rockridge(), expecting a Rockridge extension
    to be read. However, parse_rockridge() is structured as a while
    loop starting with a sanity check, and if the sanity check fails
    before the loop has run, the function returns ARCHIVE_OK without
    advancing the position in the file. This causes read_CE() to retry
    Make parse_rockridge() return ARCHIVE_WARN if it didn't read an
    extension. As someone with no real knowledge of the format, this
    seems more apt than ARCHIVE_FATAL, but both the call-sites escalate
    it to a fatal error immediately anyway.
    Found with a combination of AFL, afl-rb (FairFuzz) and qsym.

diff --git a/libarchive/archive_read_support_format_iso9660.c b/libarchive/archive_read_support_format_iso9660.c
index 28acfefb..bad8f1df 100644
--- a/libarchive/archive_read_support_format_iso9660.c
+++ b/libarchive/archive_read_support_format_iso9660.c
@@ -2102,6 +2102,7 @@ parse_rockridge(struct archive_read *a, struct file_info *file,
     const unsigned char *p, const unsigned char *end)
 	struct iso9660 *iso9660;
+	int entry_seen = 0;
 	iso9660 = (struct iso9660 *)(a->format->data);
@@ -2257,8 +2258,16 @@ parse_rockridge(struct archive_read *a, struct file_info *file,
 		p += p[2];
+		entry_seen = 1;
+	}
+	if (entry_seen)
+		return (ARCHIVE_OK);
+	else {
+		archive_set_error(&a->archive, ARCHIVE_ERRNO_FILE_FORMAT,
+				  "Tried to parse Rockridge extensions, but none found");
+		return (ARCHIVE_WARN);
-	return (ARCHIVE_OK);
 static int