File c8f08e48-systemd-notify-fix.patch of Package libvirt

commit c8f08e487672afcaa53629bddbc6703b5d90e846
Author: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 11 17:26:48 2016 -0600

    systemd: fix ready notification on abstract socket
    
    At least with systemd v210, NOTIFY_SOCKET is abstact, e.g.
    @/org/freedesktop/systemd1/notify. sendmsg() fails on such a socket
    with "Connection refused". The unix(7) man page contains the following
    details wrt abstract socket addresses
    
    abstract: an abstract socket address is distinguished (from a
              pathname socket) by the fact that sun_path[0] is a null byte
              ('\0').  The socket's address in this namespace is given by the
              additional bytes in sun_path that are covered by the specified
              length of the address structure.  (Null bytes in the name have
              no special significance.)
    
    So we need to be more precise about the address length, setting it to
    the sizeof sa_family_t + length of address copied to sun_path instead
    of setting it to the sizeof the entire sockaddr_un struct.
    
    Resolves: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987668
    Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>

Index: libvirt-2.0.0/src/util/virsystemd.c
===================================================================
--- libvirt-2.0.0.orig/src/util/virsystemd.c
+++ libvirt-2.0.0/src/util/virsystemd.c
@@ -495,7 +495,6 @@ virSystemdNotifyStartup(void)
     };
     struct msghdr mh = {
         .msg_name = &un,
-        .msg_namelen = sizeof(un),
         .msg_iov = &iov,
         .msg_iovlen = 1,
     };
@@ -515,6 +514,8 @@ virSystemdNotifyStartup(void)
     if (un.sun_path[0] == '@')
         un.sun_path[0] = '\0';
 
+    mh.msg_namelen = offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + strlen(path);
+
     fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
     if (fd < 0) {
         VIR_WARN("Unable to create socket FD");