File 0007-rsa-rsa_pk1.c-remove-memcpy-calls-from-RSA_padding_c.patch of Package openssl-1_0_0.16376
From 47f8fba64353a637cacdd8751cab25a9f3be3715 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 12:00:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] rsa/rsa_pk1.c: remove memcpy calls from
RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2.
And make RSAErr call unconditional.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit e875b0cf2f10bf2adf73e0c2ec81428290f4660c)
Resolved conflicts:
crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7737)
---
crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c | 98 +++++++++++----------
doc/crypto/RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1.pod | 7 +-
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c b/crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c
index 5d7882a3bf..074bc0a939 100644
--- a/crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c
+++ b/crypto/rsa/rsa_pk1.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
int i;
/* |em| is the encoded message, zero-padded to exactly |num| bytes */
unsigned char *em = NULL;
- unsigned int good, found_zero_byte;
+ unsigned int good, found_zero_byte, mask;
int zero_index = 0, msg_index, mlen = -1;
if (tlen < 0 || flen < 0)
@@ -218,40 +218,41 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
* section 7.2.2.
*/
- if (flen > num)
- goto err;
-
- if (num < 11)
- goto err;
+ if (flen > num || num < 11) {
+ RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2,
+ RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
+ return -1;
+ }
- if (flen != num) {
- em = OPENSSL_malloc(num);
- if (em == NULL) {
- RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
- return -1;
- }
- /*
- * Caller is encouraged to pass zero-padded message created with
- * BN_bn2binpad, but if it doesn't, we do this zero-padding copy
- * to avoid leaking that information. The copy still leaks some
- * side-channel information, but it's impossible to have a fixed
- * memory access pattern since we can't read out of the bounds of
- * |from|.
- */
- memset(em, 0, num);
- memcpy(em + num - flen, from, flen);
- from = em;
+ em = OPENSSL_malloc(num);
+ if (em == NULL) {
+ RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
+ return -1;
}
+ /*
+ * Caller is encouraged to pass zero-padded message created with
+ * BN_bn2binpad. Trouble is that since we can't read out of |from|'s
+ * bounds, it's impossible to have an invariant memory access pattern
+ * in case |from| was not zero-padded in advance.
+ */
+ for (from += flen, em += num, i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ mask = ~constant_time_is_zero(flen);
+ flen -= 1 & mask;
+ from -= 1 & mask;
+ *--em = *from & mask;
+ }
+ from = em;
good = constant_time_is_zero(from[0]);
good &= constant_time_eq(from[1], 2);
+ /* scan over padding data */
found_zero_byte = 0;
for (i = 2; i < num; i++) {
unsigned int equals0 = constant_time_is_zero(from[i]);
- zero_index =
- constant_time_select_int(~found_zero_byte & equals0, i,
- zero_index);
+
+ zero_index = constant_time_select_int(~found_zero_byte & equals0,
+ i, zero_index);
found_zero_byte |= equals0;
}
@@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
* If we never found a 0-byte, then |zero_index| is 0 and the check
* also fails.
*/
- good &= constant_time_ge((unsigned int)(zero_index), 2 + 8);
+ good &= constant_time_ge(zero_index, 2 + 8);
/*
* Skip the zero byte. This is incorrect if we never found a zero-byte
@@ -270,30 +271,35 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
mlen = num - msg_index;
/*
- * For good measure, do this check in constant time as well; it could
- * leak something if |tlen| was assuming valid padding.
+ * For good measure, do this check in constant time as well.
*/
- good &= constant_time_ge((unsigned int)(tlen), (unsigned int)(mlen));
+ good &= constant_time_ge(tlen, mlen);
/*
- * We can't continue in constant-time because we need to copy the result
- * and we cannot fake its length. This unavoidably leaks timing
- * information at the API boundary.
+ * Even though we can't fake result's length, we can pretend copying
+ * |tlen| bytes where |mlen| bytes would be real. Last |tlen| of |num|
+ * bytes are viewed as circular buffer with start at |tlen|-|mlen'|,
+ * where |mlen'| is "saturated" |mlen| value. Deducing information
+ * about failure or |mlen| would take attacker's ability to observe
+ * memory access pattern with byte granularity *as it occurs*. It
+ * should be noted that failure is indistinguishable from normal
+ * operation if |tlen| is fixed by protocol.
*/
- if (!good) {
- mlen = -1;
- goto err;
+ tlen = constant_time_select_int(constant_time_lt(num, tlen), num, tlen);
+ msg_index = constant_time_select_int(good, msg_index, num - tlen);
+ mlen = num - msg_index;
+ for (from += msg_index, mask = good, i = 0; i < tlen; i++) {
+ unsigned int equals = constant_time_eq(i, mlen);
+
+ from -= tlen & equals; /* if (i == mlen) rewind */
+ mask &= mask ^ equals; /* if (i == mlen) mask = 0 */
+ to[i] = constant_time_select_8(mask, from[i], to[i]);
}
- memcpy(to, from + msg_index, mlen);
+ OPENSSL_cleanse(em, num);
+ OPENSSL_free(em);
+ RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
+ err_clear_last_constant_time(1 & good);
- err:
- if (em != NULL) {
- OPENSSL_cleanse(em, num);
- OPENSSL_free(em);
- }
- if (mlen == -1)
- RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2,
- RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
- return mlen;
+ return constant_time_select_int(good, mlen, -1);
}
diff --git a/doc/crypto/RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1.pod b/doc/crypto/RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1.pod
index f20f815d47..800e777869 100644
--- a/doc/crypto/RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1.pod
+++ b/doc/crypto/RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1.pod
@@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ L<ERR_get_error(3)|ERR_get_error(3)>.
The RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2() padding check leaks timing
information which can potentially be used to mount a Bleichenbacher
padding oracle attack. This is an inherent weakness in the PKCS #1
-v1.5 padding design. Prefer PKCS1_OAEP padding.
+v1.5 padding design. Prefer PKCS1_OAEP padding. Otherwise it can
+be recommended to pass zero-padded B<f>, so that B<fl> equals to
+B<rsa_len>, and if fixed by protocol, B<tlen> being set to the
+expected length. In such case leakage would be minimal, it would
+take attacker's ability to observe memory access pattern with byte
+granilarity as it occurs, post-factum timing analysis won't do.
=head1 SEE ALSO
--
2.20.1