@WernerFink, @jengelh, @jsmeix, @scarabeus_iv: review reminder

As far as I see reverting using the -n option for the reconfigure_fonts scriptlets contradicts what is requested in https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067213

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - over 6 years ago

author source maintainer

Then you only have the option of expanding the reconfigure_fonts macro to understand -n; as it is now: it is broken way more than it was before

ok - read a bit more in that bug - the request there is basically not to use %%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans, but %reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets, which in turn knows a -n parameter

but then, that does not much more than expand to what you had before, namely to:

%reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets(c,n:) \
%post %{-n:-n %{-n*}} \
%reconfigure_fonts_post c \
\
%postun %{-n:-n %{-n*}} \
%reconfigure_fonts_postun c \
\
%posttrans %{-n:-n %{-n*}} \
%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans \
\
%nil

imho - revert is the right thing to get at least a package back that installs without errors - and re-evaluating for a proper fix in a 2nd step