Overview
Request History
dstoecker created request
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
Output of check script (non-fatal):
Unknown license 'BSD-2-Clause and MIT'
Unknown license 'BSD-2-Clause and MIT'
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:40"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:40
repo-checker accepted review
cycle and install check passed
dimstar declined review
Please be a bit more verbose in the changes entry ... (not just version number).
Please read https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Howto_write_good_changes for more details about a good changelog entry.
dimstar declined request
Please be a bit more verbose in the changes entry ... (not just version number).
Please read https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Howto_write_good_changes for more details about a good changelog entry.
dstoecker reopened request
I find these entries acceptable. I personally wont rewrite them. If you decline the request for such nonsense, then simply the devel package will differ from Factory for no good reason.
Please remember that Factory submissions already passed a first step review!
staging-bot accepted review
Re-evaluation needed
staging-bot added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:22
jengelh accepted review
staging-bot accepted review
ready to accept
staging-bot approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
Open for other reviewers: i won't review this (my opinion is clear and in the histrory).