Overview
Request 571262 accepted
- Fix almost-empty SRPM description.
- Fix faulty leading whitespace in descriptions.
- Reduce size of %if..%endif blocks to minimum.
- Remove pkgconfig requires that are already automatically detected.
- kronosnet-1.0 is available now(bsc#1077702)
Added: kronosnet-1.0.tar.gz
kronosnet.spec
kronosnet.changes
Request History
BinLiu created request
- Fix almost-empty SRPM description.
- Fix faulty leading whitespace in descriptions.
- Reduce size of %if..%endif blocks to minimum.
- Remove pkgconfig requires that are already automatically detected.
- kronosnet-1.0 is available now(bsc#1077702)
Added: kronosnet-1.0.tar.gz
kronosnet.spec
kronosnet.changes
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1
repo-checker accepted review
cycle and install check passed
jengelh accepted review
staging-bot accepted review
ready to accept
staging-bot approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
Please do not push this package to SLE15, it is just for corosync-3, which should be in SLE15 SP1 or later
Hi, is there anything blocking this request?
Looks ok, but please fix the wrong rpm group warnings and the spec file capitalization warnings. Thanks!
rpmlint is clueless and wrong here; ignore.
@jengelh I did not quite understand what you mean, could you explain more. thanks:)
rpmlint complains about things like "bzip2", but "bzip2" is in fact the spelling chosen for the brand/product. Do not change to "Bzip2". The same holds true for "zlib", and, for example, "openSUSE".
On the other hand, lz4 and lz4hc's branding seems to be LZ4 and LZ4HC, judging from their web pages.
@jengelh, thanks, by the way, is there anyting else I need to fix except lz4/lz4hc -> LZ4/LZ4HC, mrdocs pointed that the group is wrong. But I donot know which one.
rpmlint complains about "Productivity/Networking/HA" because rpmlint only knows the classic 50 RPM categories from 20 years ago. I say: ignore --- because there are a number of other packages that also have P./Networking/HA and they, all together, make an acceptable "HA" group in the yast2 software tree.
@mrdocs, I did not find the wrong rpm group warnings. Just fixed the spec file capitalization warnings. Could you help to point out where is the wrong rpm group warnings in the rpmlint