That's a very expensive change for TW, as it would pull Java up to ring1.

Does the doc really offer the value for that?

Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

java? you mean tex?

---

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

and some tex stuff requires java... we can provide tex in Ring1 (and do) - but not the full stack that depends on Java

---

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

e.g.

added java-10-openjdk@openSUSE:Factory/snapshot because of texlive-tex4ht:java

---

Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

ugh(ly). I'd rather aim for keeping tex out of ring1 too.

---

Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

you are 4 years late to the game: texlive has been in ring1 since Feb 2014

---

Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

then read it as: let's make it so

Await discussion/decision; need at least to disable the java bits in ring1

Well, the new doc stuff gives PDF and possibly more up-to-date info.

We can split libvorbis-docs as a separate spec file if the dependency matters, too.

Takashi Iwai (tiwai) - about 6 years ago

author source maintainer

SR#588146

Would it work?