Overview
Request History
msmeissn created request
add to factory
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:4"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:4
repo-checker accepted review
cycle and install check passed
dimstar added babelworx as a reviewer
Extra legal review: this is said to be GPL licensed, yet it's a binary-only package sans sources. in my book, this violates GPL, as we're not delivering sources for what we ship
dimstar accepted review
dimstar declined request
11 months - and no feedback from Legal on this topic. My interpretation of GPL is that we can't distribute this without the respective sources (and certainly not in the OSS repo)
msmeissn revoked request
moved to nonfree
Prebuilt binaries? Eeeks
In any case, the spec file would be muxh more readable without all the commented out stuff (which is probably mean to not use the prebuilt binaries?)
Oh, in any case: this does not comply to the GPL: ther are no sources provided by us for this binary
ok, can we submit to openSUSE:Factory:NonFree instead?
Even in non-free we would not comply with the GPL license, as we don't provide sources
Just build the package from source.
I did this once, it is quite a big thing with mingw cross compilers. Can try again ;)
Apparently it can only be allowed into Factory if a proper source RPM gets generated as well.
the mingw base compiler is rather small (IMO), I'd welcome that too
@dimstar_suse, @factory-repo-checker: review reminder