Overview
Request 697855 declined
No description set
- Created by tbechtold
- In state declined
- Open review for devel:kubic / helm
- Open review for openSUSE:Leap:15.1:Staging:adi:14
-
Open review for
RBrownSUSE
Loading...
Request History
tbechtold created request
origin-manager added leap-reviewers as a reviewer
Additional review required based on origin.
origin: openSUSE:Factory
origin-manager added as a reviewer
Need package maintainer approval for initial submission.
origin-manager accepted review
origin: openSUSE:Factory
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Leap:15.1:Staging:adi:14"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Leap:15.1:Staging:adi:14
lnussel accepted review
RBrownSUSE added RBrownSUSE as a reviewer
lnussel_factory declined request
timeout
Why should we have helm in Leap 15.1 when we don't have Kubernetes there?
Good point. But I would ask the other way arround - why don't we have k8s in Leap?
Because the SUSE-employed formal Kubernetes maintainers make a conscious decision and the informal openSUSE k8s maintainer does not want to maintain k8s on Leap on his own
Is it relevant argument? You can run helm on different node that is outside of your kubernetes cluster...
But when there is none of the kubernetes stack there (not even kubectl) then I don't see the benefit
"You can manage your helm charts, but not your cluster" doesn't seem like a cohesive offering to me.
We do provide kubectl in OpenSUSE
We do not have kubectl in openSUSE Leap
We have kubectl in openSUSE Tumbleweed (I package it) along with Helm.
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update/kubectl
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update/00Meta/lookup.yml?expand=1 kubectl: openSUSE:Factory
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/691896
I expect it is not long for this world
kubectl is missing in 15.1. It was included in 15.0 via maintenance in an invalid way. So we wouldn't take it for 15.1. The problem is that kubernetes and kubectl are build from the same sources with two spec files but kubernetes is not disabled on 15.1 so we can't have kubectl without kubernetes in the current way of how things are packaged. See sr#691896.
@RBrownSUSE, @avicenzi, @cyphar, @favogt, @flavio_castelli, @kukuk, @lnussel, @m_meister, @mjura, @ojkastl_buildservice, @psaggu: review reminder