Overview
Request 746073 accepted
No description set
- Created by scarabeus_iv
- In state accepted
Loading...
Request History
scarabeus_iv created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
ok
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
namtrac accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
Tomas, I am wondering whether it would not be better to leave the libexecdir and libdir and make just the bouncycastle archful and all others that have no scripts arch independent?
Hi Fridrich, I wrote it like this because it seems that this is the only arch difference in (https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109539) as from the attachment (https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=784071).
The script will continue if any of the files from: secfiles="%{_prefix}/lib/$suffix %{_prefix}/lib64/$suffix" doesn't exist. This is to avoid cases in which %{_libexecdir} and %{_libdir} expand to the same thing.
Yeah, I am cool with this fix at the end. making it archful would mean that the 64bit and 32bit packages would overwrite the same files and that would be also a problem. So this fix of yours is the best solution under current constraints