Overview
Request 829090 revoked
A scientific software framework used for data processing, fitting, and analysis
- Created by badshah400
- In state revoked
- Open review for licensedigger
- Open review for factory-staging
Request History
badshah400 created request
A scientific software framework used for data processing, fitting, and analysis
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85"
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85"
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:67"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:67"
licensedigger declined review
@dec16180 declined the legal report with the following comment: b'The packages contains a non-commercial license \r\nSee. root-6.22.02/math/mathcore/src/triangle.c or root-6.22.02/fonts/* '
licensedigger declined request
@dec16180 declined the legal report with the following comment: b'The packages contains a non-commercial license \r\nSee. root-6.22.02/math/mathcore/src/triangle.c or root-6.22.02/fonts/* '
dimstar_suse reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:67"
dimstar_suse declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
badshah400 revoked request
Just want to confirm that this has actually been picked up for license review; somehow a previous sr got left off the boat last time. Thanks in advance!
@dimstar This has been held up in License-review purgatory for more than two months since it was submitted. Including my previous attempt (sr#815792, which also hung around for two months or so before you, rather than the license reviewer, commented on its legality) it has now been 4 months plus since I have been trying to get this pkg included in the distro without success. I don't know if even this time it is being actually reviewed or just forgotten about. How is this acceptable?
I am so terrible sorry that this is hanging around for so long.
I just had a look at the legal report - and this looks mostly good - except one file which imho is source for the holdup:
This is non-free - which is a problem
There are actually more files imposing invalid limitations on top of LGPL:
Big thanks again for your response. I will contact upstream about these issues.
In the meanwhile, should I pull this request or let it wait for legal to decline this formally? Would you know if the latter way would make it easier for the review to happen the next time I submit?
I'd let it run - IF legal sees it and then gets a replacement, there is a chance they might remember why they declined it. OTOH, It's an utter shame that there is actually no formal review on this package happening :(
btw:
57+License: LGPL-2.1-or-later seems quite inaccurate
@dimstar Thanks again. I don't, however, see the large number of Apache-2.0 licensed files in the sources. I'm working on all the rest with upstream.
root-6.22.02/documentation/doxygen/mathjax/mathjax/config/AM_HTMLorMML.processed.js
Seems mostly do be documentation related, doxygen stuff