Request 875812 (accepted)

This request supersedes: request 875694 (Show diff)

- Do not use urandom for examples
to make package build reproducible (boo#1062303)
- Drop FAKE_BUILDDATE because gcc already normalizes __DATE__

target maintainer

Where does this string come from? Is this just some random data? If yes, why is e.g. "00000..." or "123456..." insufficient?

author

I just ran the code that creates it, if it is missing. was dd if=urandom | base64

target maintainer

dd if=/dev/zero should be sufficient then as well.

target maintainer

And while at it, you can remove FAKE_BUILDDATE, compilers use SDE nowadays.

- Do not use urandom for examples
to make package build reproducible (boo#1062303)
- Drop FAKE_BUILDDATE because gcc already normalizes __DATE__