Request History
glaubitz created request
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F"
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
dimstar_suse approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
dimstar_suse accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:F got accepted.
8+%if 0%{?_with_ringdisabled} 9+%make_build 10+%else 11 # do sequential build for reproducible .go files = https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/20272 - [boo#1102408](https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102408) 12 %make_build -j1 13+%endifNot really a fan - we test one thing in ring and then do something else int he product... worst possible idea?
If the -j1 is just for reproducible builds - we don't need that in any unpublished repo
So possible _with_ringdisabled is not the proper macro - but introduce a _require_reproducible_builds in openSUSE:Factory ?
That implies that it is somehow checked and fails if not reproducible
For lack of better macros I think we go with ring_disabled for now and hope it won't spark even funnier differences in other packages