matomo
https://matomo.org/
Matomo, formerly Piwik, is the leading open source web analytics platform that gives you valuable insights into your website’s visitors, your marketing campaigns and much more, so you can optimize your strategy and online experience of your visitors.
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory
-
1
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout network:utilities/matomo && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| matomo-5.2.1.tar.gz | 0021993866 21 MB | |
| matomo-README.SUSE | 0000001993 1.95 KB | |
| matomo-archive.cron | 0000000390 390 Bytes | |
| matomo-archive.service | 0000000388 388 Bytes | |
| matomo-archive.timer | 0000000152 152 Bytes | |
| matomo-package_update.patch | 0000000945 945 Bytes | |
| matomo-tmpfile.conf | 0000000093 93 Bytes | |
| matomo.changes | 0000164385 161 KB | |
| matomo.conf | 0000004250 4.15 KB | |
| matomo.logrotate | 0000000131 131 Bytes | |
| matomo.my.cnf | 0000000048 48 Bytes | |
| matomo.rpmlintrc | 0000000488 488 Bytes | |
| matomo.spec | 0000011397 11.1 KB |
Comments 5
Hi,
any chance we could consolidate this with our package in https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:infrastructure/matomo? It it seems over time the packages diverged, even though we aim for the same functionality. I did an
osc rdiff openSUSE:infrastructure matomo network:utilitiesand unfortunately there are quite a lot of changes - some are rather easy, like adding of a php-fpm configuration and replacing some variables. But some are bigger - for example the .changes file is completely different.Any ideas how we could go about this / are you interested in combining our works in general?
Ideally we would submit the openSUSE:infrastructure version to here (network:utilities). Then we can link it back to o:i from Factory once there and keep maintaining it in network:utilities going forward.
To be honest, I don't see why I should agree to this. The mistake was "yours" not mine. I created the package and have always maintained it in devel. I even think I corrected the non-functioning predecessor package piwik and made it work. Then "you" took the package and changed it further? and now it should be reverted. Would you be enthusiastic about this? You fix a package, continue to maintain it and suddenly someone else comes along and you want them to take it over. I would narrowly say the original Chanelog, i.e. mine, is the only valid one. I can't say what else has been changed. Do you have a diff? And despite everything, I don't trust any changes, because the package didn't work back then. And since I took it over, it has been running without a single error. So I have no idea how we should stay here.
I'm not sure why you are attacking me, I have no idea about the history, I only started working on it when the previous maintainer of the service beans.opensuse.org (which uses the matomo package from o:i) no longer did. We can leave it as is, no problem - it was just a suggestion. Also I am not asking for anything to be reverted, just for consolidation.
Nobody is attacking you. Why is everyone so sensitive now? You have to be allowed to express your opinion. And don't think about every word to see if it might offend this or that person in some way. That didn't exist in the past. It was about the matter at hand. Think devel repositories, here Network:utilities, are the sources of all other repos. For example, also for Tumbleweed. Besides, "your package" is derived from mine. See the beginning of the changelog. So I think it's more than appropriate that the package from n:u serves as the source and the others have to adapt to it. Changes and spec. We are happy to talk about any justified changes. (But let's wait and see if my suspicions about the package are confirmed again).
Again, it's not "my package", I just picked up what others left. It's fine, I was just attempting to collaborate to deduplicate efforts.