File 0001-fix-sqlite3.10.0-test.patch of Package python-SQLAlchemy

From 9cc769ac40040986708a85567ca9a23eeb4ea051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:21:33 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] - documenation updates to clarify specific SQLite versions
 that have problems with right-nested joins and UNION column keys; references
 #3633 references #3634.   backport from 1.1 to 0.9 announcing 1.1 as where
 these behaviors will be retired based on version-specific checks - fix
 test_resultset so that it passes when SQLite 3.10.0 is present, references
 #3633

(cherry picked from commit 89fa08792e98b9e31452aa3c949d9b909b10e7cd)
---
 doc/build/changelog/migration_09.rst   |  8 +++++++-
 lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/sqlite/base.py | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 test/sql/test_resultset.py             | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/build/changelog/migration_09.rst b/doc/build/changelog/migration_09.rst
index b07aed9..9138157 100644
--- a/doc/build/changelog/migration_09.rst
+++ b/doc/build/changelog/migration_09.rst
@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ as INNER JOINs could always be flattened)::
 
     SELECT a.*, b.*, c.* FROM a LEFT OUTER JOIN (b JOIN c ON b.id = c.id) ON a.id
 
-This was due to the fact that SQLite, even today, cannot parse a statement of the above format::
+This was due to the fact that SQLite up until version **3.7.16** cannot parse a statement of the above format::
 
     SQLite version 3.7.15.2 2013-01-09 11:53:05
     Enter ".help" for instructions
@@ -1248,6 +1248,12 @@ with the above queries rewritten as::
         JOIN item ON item.id = order_item_1.item_id AND item.type IN (?)
     ) AS anon_1 ON "order".id = anon_1.order_item_1_order_id
 
+.. note::
+
+    As of SQLAlchemy 1.1, the workarounds present in this feature for SQLite
+    will automatically disable themselves when SQLite version **3.7.16**
+    or greater is detected, as SQLite has repaired support for right-nested joins.
+
 The :meth:`.Join.alias`, :func:`.aliased` and :func:`.with_polymorphic` functions now
 support a new argument, ``flat=True``, which is used to construct aliases of joined-table
 entities without embedding into a SELECT.   This flag is not on by default, to help with
diff --git a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/sqlite/base.py b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/sqlite/base.py
index e19047b..0774a76 100644
--- a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/sqlite/base.py
+++ b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/sqlite/base.py
@@ -358,8 +358,14 @@ Dotted Column Names
 Using table or column names that explicitly have periods in them is
 **not recommended**.   While this is generally a bad idea for relational
 databases in general, as the dot is a syntactically significant character,
-the SQLite driver has a bug which requires that SQLAlchemy filter out these
-dots in result sets.
+the SQLite driver up until version **3.10.0** of SQLite has a bug which
+requires that SQLAlchemy filter out these dots in result sets.
+
+.. note::
+
+    The following SQLite issue has been resolved as of version 3.10.0
+    of SQLite.  SQLAlchemy as of **1.1** automatically disables its internal
+    workarounds based on detection of this version.
 
 The bug, entirely outside of SQLAlchemy, can be illustrated thusly::
 
@@ -978,6 +984,9 @@ class SQLiteExecutionContext(default.DefaultExecutionContext):
         return self.execution_options.get("sqlite_raw_colnames", False)
 
     def _translate_colname(self, colname):
+        # TODO: detect SQLite version 3.10.0 or greater;
+        # see [ticket:3633]
+
         # adjust for dotted column names.  SQLite
         # in the case of UNION may store col names as
         # "tablename.colname", or if using an attached database,
@@ -997,6 +1006,9 @@ class SQLiteDialect(default.DefaultDialect):
     supports_empty_insert = False
     supports_cast = True
     supports_multivalues_insert = True
+
+    # TODO: detect version 3.7.16 or greater;
+    # see [ticket:3634]
     supports_right_nested_joins = False
 
     default_paramstyle = 'qmark'
diff --git a/test/sql/test_resultset.py b/test/sql/test_resultset.py
index 8461996..bd68c7f 100644
--- a/test/sql/test_resultset.py
+++ b/test/sql/test_resultset.py
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ class ResultProxyTest(fixtures.TablesTest):
             dict(user_id=1, user_name='john'),
         )
 
-        # test a little sqlite weirdness - with the UNION,
+        # test a little sqlite < 3.10.0 weirdness - with the UNION,
         # cols come back as "users.user_id" in cursor.description
         r = testing.db.execute(
             text(
@@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ class ResultProxyTest(fixtures.TablesTest):
         eq_(r['user_name'], "john")
         eq_(list(r.keys()), ["user_id", "user_name"])
 
-    @testing.only_on("sqlite", "sqlite specific feature")
     def test_column_accessor_sqlite_raw(self):
         users = self.tables.users
 
@@ -346,13 +345,22 @@ class ResultProxyTest(fixtures.TablesTest):
             "users.user_name from users",
             bind=testing.db).execution_options(sqlite_raw_colnames=True). \
             execute().first()
-        not_in_('user_id', r)
-        not_in_('user_name', r)
-        eq_(r['users.user_id'], 1)
-        eq_(r['users.user_name'], "john")
-        eq_(list(r.keys()), ["users.user_id", "users.user_name"])
 
-    @testing.only_on("sqlite", "sqlite specific feature")
+        if testing.against("sqlite < 3.10.0"):
+            not_in_('user_id', r)
+            not_in_('user_name', r)
+            eq_(r['users.user_id'], 1)
+            eq_(r['users.user_name'], "john")
+
+            eq_(list(r.keys()), ["users.user_id", "users.user_name"])
+        else:
+            not_in_('users.user_id', r)
+            not_in_('users.user_name', r)
+            eq_(r['user_id'], 1)
+            eq_(r['user_name'], "john")
+
+            eq_(list(r.keys()), ["user_id", "user_name"])
+
     def test_column_accessor_sqlite_translated(self):
         users = self.tables.users
 
@@ -368,8 +376,10 @@ class ResultProxyTest(fixtures.TablesTest):
             bind=testing.db).execute().first()
         eq_(r['user_id'], 1)
         eq_(r['user_name'], "john")
-        eq_(r['users.user_id'], 1)
-        eq_(r['users.user_name'], "john")
+
+        if testing.against("sqlite < 3.10.0"):
+            eq_(r['users.user_id'], 1)
+            eq_(r['users.user_name'], "john")
         eq_(list(r.keys()), ["user_id", "user_name"])
 
     def test_column_accessor_labels_w_dots(self):
-- 
2.1.1.1.g1fb337f

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by