File 59a9221f-VT-d-use-correct-BDF-for-VF-to-search-VT-d-unit.patch of Package xen.7317
# Commit c286af54c7177c14180121b422d8df7281e547cb
# Date 2017-09-01 11:02:23 +0200
# Author Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
# Committer Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
VT-d: use correct BDF for VF to search VT-d unit
When SR-IOV is enabled, 'Virtual Functions' of a 'Physical Function'
are under the scope of the same VT-d unit as the 'Physical Function'.
A 'Physical Function' can be a 'Traditional Function' or an ARI
'Extended Function'. And furthermore, 'Extended Functions' on an
endpoint are under the scope of the same VT-d unit as the 'Traditional
Functions' on the endpoint. To search VT-d unit for a VF, if its PF
isn't an extended function, the BDF of PF should be used. Otherwise
the BDF of a traditional function in the same device with the PF
should be used.
Current code uses PCI_SLOT() to recognize an ARI 'Extended Funcion'.
But it is conceptually wrong w/o checking whether PF is an extended
function and would lead to match VFs of a RC integrated PF to a wrong
VT-d unit.
This patch overrides VF 'is_extfn' field and uses this field to
indicate whether the PF of this VF is an extended function. The field
helps to use correct BDF to search VT-d unit.
Reported-by: Crawford, Eric R <Eric.R.Crawford@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Tested-by: Crawford, Eric R <Eric.R.Crawford@intel.com>
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
@@ -572,20 +572,23 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 d
unsigned int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn), func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
const char *pdev_type;
int ret;
+ bool_t pf_is_extfn = 0;
- if (!info)
+ if ( !info )
pdev_type = "device";
- else if (info->is_extfn)
- pdev_type = "extended function";
- else if (info->is_virtfn)
+ else if ( info->is_virtfn )
{
spin_lock(&pcidevs_lock);
pdev = pci_get_pdev(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn);
+ if ( pdev )
+ pf_is_extfn = pdev->info.is_extfn;
spin_unlock(&pcidevs_lock);
if ( !pdev )
pci_add_device(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn, NULL);
pdev_type = "virtual function";
}
+ else if ( info->is_extfn )
+ pdev_type = "extended function";
else
{
info = NULL;
@@ -607,7 +610,15 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 d
goto out;
if ( info )
+ {
pdev->info = *info;
+ /*
+ * VF's 'is_extfn' field is used to indicate whether its PF is an
+ * extended function.
+ */
+ if ( pdev->info.is_virtfn )
+ pdev->info.is_extfn = pf_is_extfn;
+ }
else if ( !pdev->vf_rlen[0] )
{
unsigned int pos = pci_find_ext_capability(seg, bus, devfn,
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -211,15 +211,15 @@ struct acpi_drhd_unit *acpi_find_matched
if ( pdev == NULL )
return NULL;
- if ( pdev->info.is_extfn )
+ if ( pdev->info.is_virtfn )
{
- bus = pdev->bus;
- devfn = 0;
+ bus = pdev->info.physfn.bus;
+ devfn = !pdev->info.is_extfn ? pdev->info.physfn.devfn : 0;
}
- else if ( pdev->info.is_virtfn )
+ else if ( pdev->info.is_extfn )
{
- bus = pdev->info.physfn.bus;
- devfn = PCI_SLOT(pdev->info.physfn.devfn) ? 0 : pdev->info.physfn.devfn;
+ bus = pdev->bus;
+ devfn = 0;
}
else
{
--- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@
#define PCI_BDF2(b,df) ((((b) & 0xff) << 8) | ((df) & 0xff))
struct pci_dev_info {
+ /*
+ * VF's 'is_extfn' field is used to indicate whether its PF is an extended
+ * function.
+ */
bool_t is_extfn;
bool_t is_virtfn;
struct {