File 0147-Detail-fix-wrong-condition-in-recent-change.patch of Package mdadm.5365

From e652d1aa294af2c216660f6be3447bbf550d179e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:15:32 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 202/359] Detail: fix wrong condition in recent change.
References: bsc#1081910

Now that we can print device details with a specific raid_disk but not
disk.number, the condition for "print either disk.number or disk.raid_disk"
must be make more specific.

Reported-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>

---
 Detail.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Detail.c b/Detail.c
index 37403d6..d029219 100644
--- a/Detail.c
+++ b/Detail.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ This is pretty boring
 			continue;
 		if (!c->brief) {
 			if (d == array.raid_disks*2) printf("\n");
-			if (disk.number < 0)
+			if (disk.number < 0 && disk.raid_disk < 0)
 				printf("       -   %5d    %5d        -     ",
 				       disk.major, disk.minor);
 			else if (disk.raid_disk < 0 || disk.state & (1<<MD_DISK_JOURNAL))
-- 
2.16.1