File 0065-Fix-bus-error-when-accessing-MBR-partition-records.patch of Package mdadm.7129

From 8e2bca513efc5deccb11cb90bad3c0891c4929e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:16:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 315/359] Fix bus error when accessing MBR partition records
References: bsc#1081910

Since the MBR layout only has partition records as 2-byte aligned, the
32-bit fields in them are not aligned. Thus, they cannot be accessed on
some architectures (such as SPARC) by using a "struct MBR_part_record *"
pointer, as the compiler can assume that the pointer is properly aligned.
Instead, the records must be accessed by going through the MBR struct
itself every time.

Signed-off-by: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>

---
 part.h      |  2 +-
 super-mbr.c | 10 ++++++++++
 util.c      | 18 +++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/part.h b/part.h
index 862a14c..e697fb4 100644
--- a/part.h
+++ b/part.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct MBR_part_record {
   __u8 last_cyl;
   __u32 first_sect_lba;
   __u32 blocks_num;
-};
+} __attribute__((packed));
 
 struct MBR {
 	__u8 pad[446];
diff --git a/super-mbr.c b/super-mbr.c
index 62b3f03..f5e4cea 100644
--- a/super-mbr.c
+++ b/super-mbr.c
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ static void examine_mbr(struct supertype *st, char *homehost)
 
 	printf("   MBR Magic : %04x\n", sb->magic);
 	for (i = 0; i < MBR_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		/*
+		 * Have to make every access through sb rather than using a
+		 * pointer to the partition table (or an entry), since the
+		 * entries are not properly aligned.
+		 */
 		if (sb->parts[i].blocks_num)
 			printf("Partition[%d] : %12lu sectors at %12lu (type %02x)\n",
 			       i,
@@ -151,6 +156,11 @@ static void getinfo_mbr(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info, char *map)
 	info->component_size = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < MBR_PARTITIONS ; i++)
+		/*
+		 * Have to make every access through sb rather than using a
+		 * pointer to the partition table (or an entry), since the
+		 * entries are not properly aligned.
+		 */
 		if (sb->parts[i].blocks_num) {
 			unsigned long last =
 				(unsigned long)__le32_to_cpu(sb->parts[i].blocks_num)
diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
index a238a21..9e4718f 100644
--- a/util.c
+++ b/util.c
@@ -1412,7 +1412,6 @@ static int get_gpt_last_partition_end(int fd, unsigned long long *endofpart)
 static int get_last_partition_end(int fd, unsigned long long *endofpart)
 {
 	struct MBR boot_sect;
-	struct MBR_part_record *part;
 	unsigned long long curr_part_end;
 	unsigned part_nr;
 	int retval = 0;
@@ -1429,21 +1428,26 @@ static int get_last_partition_end(int fd, unsigned long long *endofpart)
 	if (boot_sect.magic == MBR_SIGNATURE_MAGIC) {
 		retval = 1;
 		/* found the correct signature */
-		part = boot_sect.parts;
 
 		for (part_nr = 0; part_nr < MBR_PARTITIONS; part_nr++) {
+			/*
+			 * Have to make every access through boot_sect rather
+			 * than using a pointer to the partition table (or an
+			 * entry), since the entries are not properly aligned.
+			 */
+
 			/* check for GPT type */
-			if (part->part_type == MBR_GPT_PARTITION_TYPE) {
+			if (boot_sect.parts[part_nr].part_type ==
+			    MBR_GPT_PARTITION_TYPE) {
 				retval = get_gpt_last_partition_end(fd, endofpart);
 				break;
 			}
 			/* check the last used lba for the current partition  */
-			curr_part_end = __le32_to_cpu(part->first_sect_lba) +
-				__le32_to_cpu(part->blocks_num);
+			curr_part_end =
+				__le32_to_cpu(boot_sect.parts[part_nr].first_sect_lba) +
+				__le32_to_cpu(boot_sect.parts[part_nr].blocks_num);
 			if (curr_part_end > *endofpart)
 				*endofpart = curr_part_end;
-
-			part++;
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* Unknown partition table */
-- 
2.16.1