File gdb-testsuite-fix-regexps-in-gdb.base-step-over-sysc.patch of Package gdb

From e492116f04d3b4d704c4f6f3259143d7fb16a03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:53:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] [gdb/testsuite] Fix regexps in
 gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp

When running test-case gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp without glibc debuginfo
installed, I get:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
^M
Breakpoint 2, 0x00007ffff7d4405e in vfork () from /lib64/libc.so.6^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: vfork: displaced=off: \
  continue to vfork (1st time)
...
but with glibc debuginfo installed I get instead:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
^M
Breakpoint 2, 0x00007ffff7d4405e in __libc_vfork () at \
  ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/vfork.S:44^M
44      ENTRY (__vfork)^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp: vfork: displaced=off: \
  continue to vfork (1st time)
...

The FAIL is due to a mismatch with regexp:
...
  "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*"
...
because it cannot match both ".* in " and the __libc_ prefix.

Fix this by using instead the regexp:
...
  "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in )?(__libc_)?$syscall \\(\\).*"
...

Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
index 424eee142fd..87ff2606d30 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
@@ -127,13 +127,13 @@ proc setup { syscall } {
 
     gdb_test "break \*$syscall" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]* at .*"
 
-    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*" \
+    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in )?(__libc_)?$syscall \\(\\).*" \
 	"continue to $syscall (1st time)"
     # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the first time.  In this time,
     # we will let PLT resolution done, and the number single steps we will
     # do later will be reduced.
 
-    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*" \
+    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in )?(__libc_)?$syscall \\(\\).*" \
 	"continue to $syscall (2nd time)"
     # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the second time.  In this time,
     # the address of syscall insn and next insn of syscall are recorded.
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ proc step_over_syscall { syscall } {
 		return -1
 	    }
 
-	    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*" \
+	    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in )?(__libc_)?$syscall \\(\\).*" \
 		"continue to $syscall (3rd time)"
 
 	    # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the third time.  In this time, we'll set
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ proc break_cond_on_syscall { syscall follow_fork detach_on_fork } {
 	    return -1
 	}
 
-	gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*" \
+	gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in )?(__libc_)?$syscall \\(\\).*" \
 	    "continue to $syscall"
 	# Delete breakpoint syscall insns to avoid interference with other syscalls.
 	delete_breakpoints
-- 
2.35.3