File fix-CVE-2025-32462.patch of Package sudo.39470

# Local Privilege Escalation via host option

Sudo's host (`-h` or `--host`) option is intended to be used in
conjunction with the list option (`-l` or `--list`) to list a user's
sudo privileges on a host other than the current one.  However, due
to a bug it was not restricted to listing privileges and could be
used when running a command via `sudo` or editing a file with
`sudoedit`.  Depending on the rules present in the sudoers file
this could allow a local privilege escalation attack.

## Sudo versions affected:

Sudo versions 1.8.8 to 1.9.17 inclusive are affected.

## CVE ID:

This vulnerability has been assigned
[CVE-2025-32462](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2025-32462)
in the [Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures](https://cve.mitre.org/) database.

## Details:

The intent of sudo's `-h` (`--host`) option is to make it possible
to list a user's sudo privileges for a host other than the current
one.  It was only intended be used with in conjunction with the
`-l` (`--list`) option.

The bug effectively makes the hostname portion of a sudoers rule
irrelevant since the user can set the host to be used when evaluating
the rules themselves.  A user must still be listed in the sudoers
file, but they do not needed to have an entry for the current host.

For example, given the sudoers rule:

``` plain
alice cerebus = ALL
```

user __alice__ would be able to run `sudo -h cerebus id` on any host,
not just _cerebus_.  For example:

``` plain
alice@hades$ sudo -l
Sorry, user alice may not run sudo on hades.

alice@hades$ sudo -l -h cerebus
User alice may run the following commands on cerebus:
    (root) ALL

alice@hades$ sudo -h cerebus id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
```

## Impact:

Sudoers files that include rules where the host field is not the
current host or _ALL_ are affected.  This primarily affects sites
that use a common sudoers file that is distributed to multiple
machines.  Sites that use LDAP-based sudoers (including SSSD) are
similarly impacted.

For example, a sudoers rule such as:

``` plain
bob ALL = ALL
```

is not affected since the host _ALL_ already matches any hosts,
but a rule like:

``` plain
alice cerebus = ALL
```

could allow user __alice__ to run any command even if the current
host is not _cerebus_.

## Fix:

The bug is fixed in sudo 1.9.17p1.

## Credit:

Thanks to Rich Mirch from Stratascale Cyber Research Unit (CRU) for
reporting and analyzing the bug.

diff --git a/plugins/sudoers/sudoers.c b/plugins/sudoers/sudoers.c
index 70a0c1a52..ad2fa2f61 100644
--- a/plugins/sudoers/sudoers.c
+++ b/plugins/sudoers/sudoers.c
@@ -350,6 +350,18 @@ sudoers_check_common(struct sudoers_context *ctx, int pwflag)
     time_t now;
     debug_decl(sudoers_check_common, SUDOERS_DEBUG_PLUGIN);
 
+    /* The user may only specify a host for "sudo -l". */
+    if (!ISSET(ctx->mode, MODE_LIST|MODE_CHECK)) {
+	if (strcmp(ctx->runas.host, ctx->user.host) != 0) {
+	    log_warningx(ctx, SLOG_NO_STDERR|SLOG_AUDIT,
+		N_("user not allowed to set remote host for command"));
+	    sudo_warnx("%s",
+		U_("a remote host may only be specified when listing privileges."));
+	    ret = false;
+	    goto done;
+	}
+    }
+
     /* If given the -P option, set the "preserve_groups" flag. */
     if (ISSET(ctx->mode, MODE_PRESERVE_GROUPS))
 	def_preserve_groups = true;