File 5b50df16-2-x86-make-xstate-calculation-errors-more-obvious.patch of Package xen.8389

# Commit d6371ccb93012db4ad6615fe666205b86308cb4e
# Date 2018-07-19 19:57:26 +0100
# Author Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
# Committer Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
x86/xstate: Make errors in xstate calculations more obvious by crashing the domain

If xcr0_max exceeds xfeature_mask, then something is broken with the CPUID
policy derivation or auditing logic.  If hardware rejects new_bv, then
something is broken with Xen's xstate logic.

In both cases, crash the domain with an obvious error message, to help
highlight the issues.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
@@ -707,12 +707,32 @@ int handle_xsetbv(u32 index, u64 new_bv)
     if ( index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK )
         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-    if ( (new_bv & ~xcr0_max) ||
-         (new_bv & ~xfeature_mask) || !valid_xcr0(new_bv) )
+    /*
+     * The CPUID logic shouldn't be able to hand out an XCR0 exceeding Xen's
+     * maximum features, but keep the check for robustness.
+     */
+    if ( unlikely(xcr0_max & ~xfeature_mask) )
+    {
+        gprintk(XENLOG_ERR,
+                "xcr0_max %016" PRIx64 " exceeds hardware max %016" PRIx64 "\n",
+                xcr0_max, xfeature_mask);
+        domain_crash(curr->domain);
+
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    if ( (new_bv & ~xcr0_max) || !valid_xcr0(new_bv) )
         return -EINVAL;
 
-    if ( !set_xcr0(new_bv) )
+    /* By this point, new_bv really should be accepted by hardware. */
+    if ( unlikely(!set_xcr0(new_bv)) )
+    {
+        gprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "new_bv %016" PRIx64 " rejected by hardware\n",
+                new_bv);
+        domain_crash(curr->domain);
+
         return -EFAULT;
+    }
 
     mask = new_bv & ~curr->arch.xcr0_accum;
     curr->arch.xcr0 = new_bv;