File gdb-cli-handle-pending-c-after-rl_callback_read_char.patch of Package gdb.32332

From 3f5ef7bf512c7565279832bad3d5c743e9d8ae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 10:53:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/cli] Handle pending ^C after rl_callback_read_char
 for readline 7

In commit faf01aee1d0 ("[gdb] Handle pending ^C after rl_callback_read_char")
we handled a problem (described in detail in that commit) for readline >= 8
using public readline functions rl_pending_signal and rl_check_signals.

For readline 7 (note that we require at least readline 7 so there's no need to
worry about readline 6), there was no fix though, because rl_check_signals was
not available.

Fix this by instead using the private readline function _rl_signal_handler.

There is precedent for using private readline variables and functions, but
it's something we want to get rid of (PR build/10723).  Nevertheless, I think
we can allow this specific instance because it's not used when building
against readline >= 8.

[ In the meanwhile, a fix was committed in the devel branch of the readline
repo, contained in commit 8d0c439 ("rollup of changes since readline-8.2"),
first proposed here (
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-10/msg00008.html ). ]

Tested on x86_64-linux, against system readline 7.0 on openSUSE Leap 15.4.

PR cli/27813
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27813
---
 gdb/event-top.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/event-top.c b/gdb/event-top.c
index 9181e4bdcff..399582698c1 100644
--- a/gdb/event-top.c
+++ b/gdb/event-top.c
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ static struct async_signal_handler *async_sigterm_token;
    character is processed.  */
 void (*after_char_processing_hook) (void);
 
+#if RL_VERSION_MAJOR == 7
+EXTERN_C void _rl_signal_handler (int);
+#endif
 
 /* Wrapper function for calling into the readline library.  This takes
    care of a couple things:
@@ -200,8 +203,14 @@ gdb_rl_callback_read_char_wrapper_noexcept () noexcept
 	   pending signal.  I'm not sure if that's possible, but it seems
 	   better to handle the scenario than to assert.  */
 	rl_check_signals ();
+#elif RL_VERSION_MAJOR == 7
+      /* Unfortunately, rl_check_signals is not available.  Use private
+	 function _rl_signal_handler instead.  */
+
+      while (rl_pending_signal () != 0)
+	_rl_signal_handler (rl_pending_signal ());
 #else
-      /* Unfortunately, rl_check_signals is not available.  */
+#error "Readline major version >= 7 expected"
 #endif
       if (after_char_processing_hook)
 	(*after_char_processing_hook) ();

base-commit: 7f7fcd7031430953f41b284069d1ed0cf3c8734a
-- 
2.35.3