File libvirt-virSecuritySELinuxSetFileconHelper-Don-t-fail-on-read-only-NFS.patch of Package libvirt

From 3d099619aba045e475f98d86c97002364a6ca20c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <3d099619aba045e475f98d86c97002364a6ca20c@dist-git>
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:22:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] virSecuritySELinuxSetFileconHelper: Don't fail on read-only
 NFS

RHEL-6.6: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095135
RHEL-7.0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996543

When starting up a domain, the SELinux labeling is done depending on
current configuration. If the labeling fails we check for possible
causes, as not all labeling failures are fatal. For example, if the
labeled file is on NFS which lacks SELinux support, the file can still
be readable to qemu process. These cases are distinguished by the errno
code: NFS without SELinux support returns EOPNOTSUPP. However, we were
missing one scenario. In case there's a read-only disk on a read-only
NFS (and possibly any FS) and the labeling is just optional (not
explicitly requested in the XML) there's no need to make the labeling
error fatal. In other words, read-only file on read-only NFS can fail to
be labeled, but be readable at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit d1fdecb6240cab8872fd39b0a6dd0df1ebd52b86)
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
---
 src/security/security_selinux.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
index a030701..726cdc5 100644
--- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
+++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
@@ -800,13 +800,14 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetFileconHelper(const char *path, char *tcon, bool optional)
             freecon(econ);
         }
 
-        /* if the error complaint is related to an image hosted on
-         * an nfs mount, or a usbfs/sysfs filesystem not supporting
-         * labelling, then just ignore it & hope for the best.
-         * The user hopefully set one of the necessary SELinux
-         * virt_use_{nfs,usb,pci}  boolean tunables to allow it...
+        /* If the error complaint is related to an image hosted on a (possibly
+         * read-only) NFS mount, or a usbfs/sysfs filesystem not supporting
+         * labelling, then just ignore it & hope for the best.  The user
+         * hopefully sets one of the necessary SELinux virt_use_{nfs,usb,pci}
+         * boolean tunables to allow it ...
          */
-        if (setfilecon_errno != EOPNOTSUPP && setfilecon_errno != ENOTSUP) {
+        if (setfilecon_errno != EOPNOTSUPP && setfilecon_errno != ENOTSUP &&
+            setfilecon_errno != EROFS) {
             virReportSystemError(setfilecon_errno,
                                  _("unable to set security context '%s' on '%s'"),
                                  tcon, path);
-- 
1.9.3