File 5cab1f66-timers-fix-memory-leak-with-cpu-plug.p... of Package xen

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File 5cab1f66-timers-fix-memory-leak-with-cpu-plug.patch of Package xen (Revision 2eceb61a2a4938f53b2c533ca49bbbdd)

Currently displaying revision 2eceb61a2a4938f53b2c533ca49bbbdd , Show latest

# Commit 597fbb8be6021440cd53493c14201c32671bade1
# Date 2019-04-08 11:16:06 +0100
# Author Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
# Committer Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
xen/timers: Fix memory leak with cpu unplug/plug

timer_softirq_action() realloc's itself a larger timer heap whenever
necessary, which includes bootstrapping from the empty dummy_heap.  Nothing
ever freed this allocation.

CPU plug and unplug has the side effect of zeroing the percpu data area, which
clears ts->heap.  This in turn causes new timers to be put on the list rather
than the heap, and for timer_softirq_action() to bootstrap itself again.

This in practice leaks ts->heap every time a CPU is unplugged and replugged.

Implement free_percpu_timers() which includes freeing ts->heap when
appropriate, and update the notifier callback with the recent cpu parking
logic and free-avoidance across suspend.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

# Commit a6448adfd3d537aacbbd784e5bf1777ab3ff5f85
# Date 2019-04-09 10:12:57 +0100
# Author Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
# Committer Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
xen/cpu: Fix ARM build following c/s 597fbb8

c/s 597fbb8 "xen/timers: Fix memory leak with cpu unplug/plug" broke the ARM
build by being the first patch to add park_offline_cpus to common code.

While it is currently specific to Intel hardware (for reasons of being able to
handle machine check exceptions without an immediate system reset), it isn't
inherently architecture specific, so define it to be false on ARM for now.

Add a comment in both smp.h headers explaining the intended behaviour of the
option.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

# Commit 1aec95350ac8261cba516371710d4d837c26f6a0
# Date 2019-04-15 17:51:30 +0100
# Author Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
# Committer Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
timers: move back migrate_timers_from_cpu() invocation

Commit 597fbb8be6 ("xen/timers: Fix memory leak with cpu unplug/plug")
went a little too far: Migrating timers away from a CPU being offlined
needs to heppen independent of whether it get parked or fully offlined.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

xen/timers: Fix memory leak with cpu unplug/plug (take 2)

Previous attempts to fix this leak failed to identify the root cause, and
ultimately failed.  The cause is the CPU_UP_PREPARE case (re)initialising
ts->heap back to dummy_heap, which leaks the previous allocation.

Rearrange the logic to only initialise ts once.  This also avoids the
redundant (but benign, due to ts->inactive always being empty) initialising of
the other ts fields.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/common/timer.c
+++ b/xen/common/timer.c
@@ -601,6 +601,20 @@ static void migrate_timers_from_cpu(unsi
 
 static struct timer *dummy_heap;
 
+static void free_percpu_timers(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+    struct timers *ts = &per_cpu(timers, cpu);
+
+    ASSERT(GET_HEAP_SIZE(ts->heap) == 0);
+    if ( GET_HEAP_LIMIT(ts->heap) )
+    {
+        xfree(ts->heap);
+        ts->heap = &dummy_heap;
+    }
+    else
+        ASSERT(ts->heap == &dummy_heap);
+}
+
 static int cpu_callback(
     struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
@@ -610,14 +624,28 @@ static int cpu_callback(
     switch ( action )
     {
     case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
-        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ts->inactive);
-        spin_lock_init(&ts->lock);
-        ts->heap = &dummy_heap;
+        /* Only initialise ts once. */
+        if ( !ts->heap )
+        {
+            INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ts->inactive);
+            spin_lock_init(&ts->lock);
+            ts->heap = &dummy_heap;
+        }
         break;
+
     case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
     case CPU_DEAD:
         migrate_timers_from_cpu(cpu);
+
+        if ( !park_offline_cpus && system_state != SYS_STATE_suspend )
+            free_percpu_timers(cpu);
         break;
+
+    case CPU_REMOVE:
+        if ( park_offline_cpus )
+            free_percpu_timers(cpu);
+        break;
+
     default:
         break;
     }
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/smp.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/smp.h
@@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_
 
 #define raw_smp_processor_id() (get_processor_id())
 
+/*
+ * Do we, for platform reasons, need to actually keep CPUs online when we
+ * would otherwise prefer them to be off?
+ */
+#define park_offline_cpus false
+
 extern void noreturn stop_cpu(void);
 
 extern int arch_smp_init(void);
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/smp.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/smp.h
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibli
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_mask);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, scratch_cpumask);
 
+/*
+ * Do we, for platform reasons, need to actually keep CPUs online when we
+ * would otherwise prefer them to be off?
+ */
 extern bool park_offline_cpus;
 
 void smp_send_nmi_allbutself(void);

Places

File 5cab1f66-timers-fix-memory-leak-with-cpu-plug.patch of Package xen (Revision 2eceb61a2a4938f53b2c533ca49bbbdd)

Places