File memalign-overflow-check.patch of Package glibc.42452

From 744b63026a29f7eedbbc8e3a01a7f48a6eb0a085 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 06:06:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] memalign: reinstate alignment overflow check (CVE-2026-0861)

The change to cap valid sizes to PTRDIFF_MAX inadvertently dropped the
overflow check for alignment in memalign functions, _mid_memalign and
_int_memalign.  Reinstate the overflow check in _int_memalign, aligned
with the PTRDIFF_MAX change since that is directly responsible for the
CVE.  The missing _mid_memalign check is not relevant (and does not have
a security impact) and may need a different approach to fully resolve,
so it has been omitted.

CVE-Id: CVE-2026-0861
Vulnerable-Commit: 9bf8e29ca136094f73f69f725f15c51facc97206
Reported-by: Igor Morgenstern, Aisle Research
Fixes: BZ #33796
Reviewed-by: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
(cherry picked from commit c9188d333717d3ceb7e3020011651f424f749f93)
---
 malloc/malloc.c               |  7 +++++--
 malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c | 10 ++--------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
index d0bbbf3710..70bf56d16c 100644
--- a/malloc/malloc.c
+++ b/malloc/malloc.c
@@ -5042,7 +5042,7 @@ _int_memalign (mstate av, size_t alignment, size_t bytes)
   INTERNAL_SIZE_T size;
 
   nb = checked_request2size (bytes);
-  if (nb == 0)
+  if (nb == 0 || alignment > PTRDIFF_MAX)
     {
       __set_errno (ENOMEM);
       return NULL;
@@ -5058,7 +5058,10 @@ _int_memalign (mstate av, size_t alignment, size_t bytes)
      we don't find anything in those bins, the common malloc code will
      scan starting at 2x.  */
 
-  /* Call malloc with worst case padding to hit alignment. */
+  /* Call malloc with worst case padding to hit alignment.  ALIGNMENT is a
+     power of 2, so it tops out at (PTRDIFF_MAX >> 1) + 1, leaving plenty of
+     space to add MINSIZE and whatever checked_request2size adds to BYTES to
+     get NB.  Consequently, total below also does not overflow.  */
   m = (char *) (_int_malloc (av, nb + alignment + MINSIZE));
 
   if (m == 0)
diff --git a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c
index 44979018b8..a5082c1fec 100644
--- a/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c
+++ b/malloc/tst-malloc-too-large.c
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ test_large_allocations (size_t size)
 }
 
 
-static long pagesize;
 
 /* This function tests the following aligned memory allocation functions
    using several valid alignments and precedes each allocation test with a
@@ -171,8 +170,8 @@ test_large_aligned_allocations (size_t size)
 
   /* All aligned memory allocation functions expect an alignment that is a
      power of 2.  Given this, we test each of them with every valid
-     alignment from 1 thru PAGESIZE.  */
-  for (align = 1; align <= pagesize; align *= 2)
+     alignment for the type of ALIGN, i.e. until it wraps to 0.  */
+  for (align = 1; align > 0; align <<= 1)
     {
       test_setup ();
 #if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
@@ -265,11 +264,6 @@ do_test (void)
   DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7, "-Walloc-size-larger-than=");
 #endif
 
-  /* Aligned memory allocation functions need to be tested up to alignment
-     size equivalent to page size, which should be a power of 2.  */
-  pagesize = sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE);
-  TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (powerof2 (pagesize));
-
   /* Loop 1: Ensure that all allocations with SIZE close to SIZE_MAX, i.e.
      in the range (SIZE_MAX - 2^14, SIZE_MAX], fail.
 
-- 
2.52.0