File iproute-fix-documentation-for-ip-rule-scan-orde... of Package iproute2.3043

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File iproute-fix-documentation-for-ip-rule-scan-order-2.patch of Package iproute2.3043

From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:33:03 +0200
Subject: iproute: fix documentation for ip rule scan order
Patch-mainline: v4.9.0
Git-commit: 31a29009c5e921e81ff8419c482f826de5a1a493
References: bsc#990635

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:59:55AM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:04:54AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:32:52 -0700
> > Iskren Chernev <iskren@imo.im> wrote:
> >
> > > From 416f45b62f33017d19a9b14e7b0179807c993cbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Iskren Chernev <iskren@imo.im>
> > > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:08:54 -0700
> > > Subject: [PATCH bug-fix] iproute: fix documentation for ip rule scan order
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  man/man8/ip-rule.8 | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/man/man8/ip-rule.8 b/man/man8/ip-rule.8
> > > index 1774ae3..3508d80 100644
> > > --- a/man/man8/ip-rule.8
> > > +++ b/man/man8/ip-rule.8
> > > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Each policy routing rule consists of a
> > >  .B selector
> > >  and an
> > >  .B action predicate.
> > > -The RPDB is scanned in order of decreasing priority. The selector
> > > +The RPDB is scanned in order of increasing priority. The selector
> > >  of each rule is applied to {source address, destination address,
> > > incoming
> > >  interface, tos, fwmark} and, if the selector matches the packet,
> > >  the action is performed. The action predicate may return with success.
> > > --
> > > 2.4.5
> >
> > Applied
>
> I'm sorry I didn't notice before but this just reverts the change done
> by commit 49572501664d ("iproute2: clarification of various man8 pages").
> IMHO the problem is that both versions are equally confusing as the word
> "priority" can be understood in two different senses.
>
> How about more explicit formulation, e.g.
>
>   ... in order of decreasing logical priority (i.e. increasing numeric
>   values).
>
> Would that be better?

Looks like the real issue is missing definition of priority. What about
this:

Acked-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>

---
 man/man8/ip-rule.8 | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man/man8/ip-rule.8 b/man/man8/ip-rule.8
index 2c1e8260ab5a..dc93ffb0adae 100644
--- a/man/man8/ip-rule.8
+++ b/man/man8/ip-rule.8
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Each policy routing rule consists of a
 .B selector
 and an
 .B action predicate.
-The RPDB is scanned in order of increasing priority. The selector
+The RPDB is scanned in order of decreasing priority. The selector
 of each rule is applied to {source address, destination address, incoming
 interface, tos, fwmark} and, if the selector matches the packet,
 the action is performed. The action predicate may return with success.
@@ -216,8 +216,10 @@ value to match.
 
 .TP
 .BI priority " PREFERENCE"
-the priority of this rule. Each rule should have an explicitly
-set
+the priority of this rule.
+.I PREFERENCE
+is an unsigned integer value, higher number means lower priority.  Each rule
+should have an explicitly set
 .I unique
 priority value.
 The options preference and order are synonyms with priority.
-- 
2.13.2

Places

File iproute-fix-documentation-for-ip-rule-scan-order-2.patch of Package iproute2.3043

Places