File gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.opt-clobbered-registers-o... of Package gdb

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.opt-clobbered-registers-o2.exp-with-gcc-12.patch of Package gdb (Revision c841ff9c484c7e109034db49cbf246be)

Currently displaying revision c841ff9c484c7e109034db49cbf246be , Show latest

[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.exp with gcc-12

When running test-case gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.exp with gcc-12, I run
into:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.exp: backtracing
print operand0^M
$1 = (unsigned int *) 0x7fffffffd070^M
(gdb) print *operand0^M
$2 = 4195541^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.exp: print operand0
...

The problem is that starting gcc-12, the assignments to x and y in main are
optimized away:
...
int main(void)
{
  unsigned x, y;

x = 13;
  y = 14;
  return (int)gen_movsd (&x, &y);
...

Fix this by making x and y volatile.

Note that the test-case intends to check the handling of debug info for
optimized code in function gen_movsd, so inhibiting optimization in main
doesn't interfere with that.

Tested on x86_64-linux.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29161

---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.c
index 7776024eb90..83cf2267d1e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/clobbered-registers-O2.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ gen_movsd (unsigned * operand0, unsigned * operand1)
 
 int main(void)
 {
-  unsigned x, y;
+  volatile unsigned x, y;
 
   x = 13;
   y = 14;

Places

File gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.opt-clobbered-registers-o2.exp-with-gcc-12.patch of Package gdb (Revision c841ff9c484c7e109034db49cbf246be)

Places