File ghostscript-fonts.changes of Package ghostscript-fonts

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File ghostscript-fonts.changes of Package ghostscript-fonts (Revision b1f556b1f5197b4e764efe732be1fb66)

Currently displaying revision b1f556b1f5197b4e764efe732be1fb66 , Show latest

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Feb 28 11:21:37 UTC 2020 - Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>

- Add "Provides: urw-fonts" to ghostscript-fonts-std since some
  binary packages like the ones from grafana.com explicitly require
  "urw-fonts".

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Dec 27 10:54:48 UTC 2017 - dimstar@opensuse.org

- Revert last change: reconfigure_post_* does not know a -n
  parameter, which in turn results in warnings (rpm < 4.14) or
  errors (rpm >= 4.14).

> reconfigure_fonts_post: invalid option -- 'n'
  > error: Unknown option n in reconfigure_fonts_post(c)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Dec 18 14:18:10 CET 2017 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Call reconfigure_fonts_* -n binary_RPM_package_name
  on openSUSE Tumbleweed and Leap 15.0 and SLE15 and later
  (boo#1067213).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Oct  4 12:24:39 CEST 2017 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Do no longer mess around with the original fonts: Do no longer
  try to "improve" the appearance of glyphs in certain fonts in
  a SUSE-sepcific way. Provide the fonts as originally intended.
  Now neither the SUSE-sepcific ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch
  nor special tools like t1ascii and t1binary from the t1utils RPM
  are needed to build a RPM package that only contains fonts.
  Cf. the entry below dated "Tue Mar 27 16:57:57 CEST 2012".

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Sep 28 16:35:29 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Set the version is the same version as the current ghostscript
  package i.e. 9.06 because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages
  are the right ones for this Ghostscript version.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Sep 28 10:46:03 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Have SuSEconfig.pango stuff in RPM scriptlets only
  if suse_version < 1220 because since openSUSE 12.2
  there is no longer SuSEconfig.pango (see the "declined"
  comment of OBS submitrequest 136232).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thu Sep 27 13:22:44 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Using an absolute path as source in symbolic link in spec file
  to avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11, SLE_11_SP1,
  and SLE_11_SP2 that would wrongly convert a relative path
  ../ghostscript/fonts into a ../ghostscript/fonts.gz file.
  Afterwards /usr/lib/rpm/brp-symlink converts it to a relative
  path so that the binary RPM gets the intended symbolic link
  /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript -> ../ghostscript/fonts
  (bnc#778879).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Sep 26 10:09:22 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Provide a link /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript which points to
  /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts (the directory where Ghostscript
  expects its fonts) to make the Ghostscript fonts also appear
  in the directory /usr/share/fonts/ where applications
  search for fonts (bnc#778879).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Sep 25 14:58:06 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Fix the negligent changes done by the below "prepare spec file
  for dropping SuSEconfig.fonts" so that it builds again for
  all released openSUSE versions (up to 12.2) because only
  if suse_version > 1220 one can BuildRequire fontpackages-devel
  which provides the RPM macros like reconfigure_fonts_post,
  reconfigure_fonts_postun, and reconfigure_fonts_posttrans.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Aug  6 16:40:38 UTC 2012 - pgajdos@suse.com

- prepare spec file for dropping SuSEconfig.fonts (openFATE#313536)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Mar 28 10:40:34 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Have the version the same as the current ghostscript package
  (currently Ghostscript version 9.05). This versioning scheme
  makes sense because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages are the
  right ones for this Ghostscript version (see bnc#735824).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Mar 27 16:57:57 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch is made by mfabian@suse.de
  see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse36778
  (bnc#51778).
  It changes weight of "Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium Italic"
  and "Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium" back to "Bold" instead
  of "Medium".
  ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch must be listed as SourceNNN
  because it is applied via an explicit patch call in install
  section but the SUSE internal check_if_valid_source_dir tool
  could abort with fatal error because it thinks this patch
  is not applied
  (see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649207#c17).

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Mar 27 12:19:14 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de

- Initial ghostscript-fonts package.

Places

File ghostscript-fonts.changes of Package ghostscript-fonts (Revision b1f556b1f5197b4e764efe732be1fb66)

Places