File 5e7cfb29-x86-ucode-fix-error-paths-in-apply_microcode.patch of Package xen.14764
# Commit d2a0a96cf76603b2e2b87c3ce80c3f9d098327d4
# Date 2020-03-26 18:57:45 +0000
# Author Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
# Committer Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
x86/ucode: Fix error paths in apply_microcode()
In the unlikley case that patch application completes, but the resutling
revision isn't expected, sig->rev doesn't get updated to match reality.
It will get adjusted the next time collect_cpu_info() gets called, but in the
meantime Xen might operate on a stale value. Nothing good will come of this.
Rewrite the logic to always update the stashed revision, before worrying about
whether the attempt was a success or failure.
Take the opportunity to make the printk() messages as consistent as possible.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int
{
unsigned long flags;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
- uint32_t rev;
+ uint32_t rev, old_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = uci->mc.mc_amd;
struct microcode_header_amd *hdr;
int hw_err;
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int
/* get patch id after patching */
rdmsrl(MSR_AMD_PATCHLEVEL, rev);
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(µcode_update_lock, flags);
@@ -227,15 +228,14 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int
/* check current patch id and patch's id for match */
if ( hw_err || (rev != hdr->patch_id) )
{
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision "
- "%#x to %#x failed\n", cpu, rev, hdr->patch_id);
+ printk(XENLOG_ERR
+ "microcode: CPU%u update rev %#x to %#x failed, result %#x\n",
+ cpu, old_rev, hdr->patch_id, rev);
return -EIO;
}
- printk(KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision %#x to %#x\n",
- cpu, uci->cpu_sig.rev, hdr->patch_id);
-
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ printk(XENLOG_WARNING "microcode: CPU%u updated from revision %#x to %#x\n",
+ cpu, old_rev, rev);
return 0;
}
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -281,9 +281,9 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int
{
unsigned long flags;
uint64_t msr_content;
- unsigned int val[2];
unsigned int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num);
+ uint32_t rev, old_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
@@ -303,23 +303,24 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, msr_content);
- val[1] = (uint32_t)(msr_content >> 32);
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev = msr_content >> 32;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(µcode_update_lock, flags);
- if ( val[1] != uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev )
+
+ if ( rev != uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev )
{
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision "
- "%#x to %#x failed. Resulting revision is %#x.\n", cpu_num,
- uci->cpu_sig.rev, uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev, val[1]);
+ printk(XENLOG_ERR
+ "microcode: CPU%u update rev %#x to %#x failed, result %#x\n",
+ cpu, old_rev, uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev, rev);
return -EIO;
}
- printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision "
- "%#x to %#x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x \n",
- cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1],
+
+ printk(XENLOG_WARNING
+ "microcode: CPU%u updated from revision %#x to %#x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ cpu, old_rev, rev,
uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date & 0xffff,
uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date >> 24,
(uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
- uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
return 0;
}