Shared-storage based death
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/sbd
A highly reliable fencing or Shoot-the-other-node-in-the-head (STONITH) mechanism that works by utilizing shared storage.
- Devel package for openSUSE:Factory
-
5
derived packages
- Links to openSUSE:Factory / sbd
- Has a link diff
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout network:ha-clustering:Factory/sbd && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files (show unmerged sources)
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| _service | 0000000555 555 Bytes | |
| _servicedata | 0000000220 220 Bytes | |
|
bsc#1140065-Fix-sbd-cluster-exit-if-cmap-is-discon |
0000003559 3.48 KB | |
|
bsc#1180966-0001-Log-sbd-inquisitor-downgrade-the- |
0000000981 981 Bytes | |
| harden_sbd.service.patch | 0000000649 649 Bytes | |
| harden_sbd_remote.service.patch | 0000000670 670 Bytes | |
| sbd-1.5.2+20230316.5ec38cf.tar.xz | 0000072836 71.1 KB | |
| sbd.changes | 0000033703 32.9 KB | |
| sbd.spec | 0000005523 5.39 KB |
Comments 4
Would it make sense to rename the title of the package in OBS and summary in spec file to "Shared-storage based death" ? That is the name upstream uses.
And when you agree, the description (both in OBS and spec) could be changed to: A highly reliable fencing or Shoot-the-other-node-in-the-head (STONITH) mechanism that works by utilizing shared storage.
Done.
Great. Thank you :-)
Yes, it's never wrong to be more specific :-) I'll change them. Thanks for the suggestion.