Stable Releases of Upstream github.com/containers packages

No description set
Name Changed
Comments for devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable 20

Trung Le's avatar

runlevel5 wrote 7 months ago

HI team

I would like to ask why there is no build for ppc64le on xUbuntu_20.04 and 20.10?

Thanks

Trung


Peter Hunt's avatar

haircommander wrote 7 months ago

I've attempted to enable it!


Lokesh Mandvekar's avatar

lsm5 wrote 7 months ago

@runlevel5 the ppc64le environment itself seems to not be setup correctly, so we just can't build any packages there. Last time I checked, there was some kernel issues and those were low on the priority list for the admins. So, there's not much we can do.


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote 6 months ago

This comment has been deleted


Richard Brown's avatar

RBrownSUSE wrote 6 months ago

I don't see any evidence that builds for Debian_10 have been disabled..how/where did you discover this?


Roland Sommer's avatar

rsommer wrote 6 months ago

Sorry, I wasn't specific enough (edited already), I was refering to the podman builds. These are marked as "disabled" and there are indeed no builds for podman 3.1 in the repository.


Valentin Rothberg's avatar

vrothberg wrote 6 months ago

Older distros are not receiving packages anymore (see https://podman.io/blogs/2021/03/02/podman-support-for-older-distros.html).

The support matrix grew too big to keep up with all the packaging work. Especially older distros are challenging (e.g., old kernels, old libraries, etc.).


Darren L's avatar

DazEErR wrote 3 months ago

Any chance apparmor will be enabled at some point? From my understanding containers-common has a application upstream that outputs the required default apparmor profile.


Lokesh Mandvekar's avatar

lsm5 wrote 3 months ago

@sagrunert, @vrothberg Dan Walsh mentioned you both would be the right people to ask about apparmor. Could you PTAL and let me know what's to be done here?


Sascha Grunert's avatar

sagrunert wrote 3 months ago

I don't see why not, we may just add libapparmor as (optional) dependency and add the corresponding build tag if available, right? :)


Lokesh Mandvekar's avatar

lsm5 wrote 3 months ago

In addition to apparmor buildtag, do I need to change anything in containers.conf . I see apparmor_profile = "container-default" in containers.conf. Does that need to be uncommented, or is that assumed by default, or anything else?


Lokesh Mandvekar's avatar

lsm5 wrote 3 months ago

I see that I have added the apparmor buildtag to podman build rules already. So, I'm guessing there's something else that we need to include?


Sascha Grunert's avatar

sagrunert wrote 3 months ago

I assume we're talking about Podman. About which distribution are we talking?


Lokesh Mandvekar's avatar

lsm5 wrote 3 months ago

@DazEErR are you talking about any tool in particular? podman / buildah / cri-o? Also, any Ubuntu version in particular?


Darren L's avatar

DazEErR wrote 3 months ago

Hi, well in particular running podman containers with AA enabled, and I'm personally using Ubuntu 20.04. If you mean which tool generates AppArmour profiles I was on about this: https://github.com/containers/common/tree/main/pkg/apparmor. Warning not a dev only had a quick skim :)



Sascha Grunert's avatar

sagrunert wrote 3 months ago

Podman on Ubuntu 20.04 builds with the apparmor tag. Can you please open an issue within the podman repository containing the requested outputs there? I think it would be better to track the issue there if there is some.


Darren L's avatar

DazEErR wrote 2 months ago

Excuse my ignorance but I'm not that familiar with OBS. Where exactly should I open a bug report? EDIT: Never mind realised you meant containers/podman on GH.


openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by