@runlevel5 the ppc64le environment itself seems to not be setup correctly, so we just can't build any packages there. Last time I checked, there was some kernel issues and those were low on the priority list for the admins. So, there's not much we can do.
Sorry, I wasn't specific enough (edited already), I was refering to the podman builds. These are marked as "disabled" and there are indeed no builds for podman 3.1 in the repository.
The support matrix grew too big to keep up with all the packaging work. Especially older distros are challenging (e.g., old kernels, old libraries, etc.).
Any chance apparmor will be enabled at some point? From my understanding containers-common has a application upstream that outputs the required default apparmor profile.
@sagrunert, @vrothberg Dan Walsh mentioned you both would be the right people to ask about apparmor. Could you PTAL and let me know what's to be done here?
In addition to apparmor buildtag, do I need to change anything in containers.conf . I see apparmor_profile = "container-default" in containers.conf. Does that need to be uncommented, or is that assumed by default, or anything else?
Hi, well in particular running podman containers with AA enabled, and I'm personally using Ubuntu 20.04. If you mean which tool generates AppArmour profiles I was on about this: https://github.com/containers/common/tree/main/pkg/apparmor. Warning not a dev only had a quick skim :)
Podman on Ubuntu 20.04 builds with the apparmor tag. Can you please open an issue within the podman repository containing the requested outputs there? I think it would be better to track the issue there if there is some.
Excuse my ignorance but I'm not that familiar with OBS. Where exactly should I open a bug report?
EDIT: Never mind realised you meant containers/podman on GH.
Comments for devel:kubic:libcontainers:stable 20
runlevel5 wrote 7 months ago
HI team
I would like to ask why there is no build for ppc64le on xUbuntu_20.04 and 20.10?
Thanks
Trung
haircommander wrote 7 months ago
I've attempted to enable it!
lsm5 wrote 7 months ago
@runlevel5 the ppc64le environment itself seems to not be setup correctly, so we just can't build any packages there. Last time I checked, there was some kernel issues and those were low on the priority list for the admins. So, there's not much we can do.
_nobody_ wrote 6 months ago
This comment has been deleted
Delete comment?
Please confirm deletion of comment
RBrownSUSE wrote 6 months ago
I don't see any evidence that builds for Debian_10 have been disabled..how/where did you discover this?
rsommer wrote 6 months ago
Sorry, I wasn't specific enough (edited already), I was refering to the podman builds. These are marked as "disabled" and there are indeed no builds for podman 3.1 in the repository.
vrothberg wrote 6 months ago
Older distros are not receiving packages anymore (see https://podman.io/blogs/2021/03/02/podman-support-for-older-distros.html).
The support matrix grew too big to keep up with all the packaging work. Especially older distros are challenging (e.g., old kernels, old libraries, etc.).
DazEErR wrote 3 months ago
Any chance apparmor will be enabled at some point? From my understanding containers-common has a application upstream that outputs the required default apparmor profile.
lsm5 wrote 3 months ago
@sagrunert, @vrothberg Dan Walsh mentioned you both would be the right people to ask about apparmor. Could you PTAL and let me know what's to be done here?
sagrunert wrote 3 months ago
I don't see why not, we may just add libapparmor as (optional) dependency and add the corresponding build tag if available, right? :)
lsm5 wrote 3 months ago
In addition to apparmor buildtag, do I need to change anything in containers.conf . I see apparmor_profile = "container-default" in containers.conf. Does that need to be uncommented, or is that assumed by default, or anything else?
lsm5 wrote 3 months ago
I see that I have added the apparmor buildtag to podman build rules already. So, I'm guessing there's something else that we need to include?
sagrunert wrote 3 months ago
I assume we're talking about Podman. About which distribution are we talking?
lsm5 wrote 3 months ago
@DazEErR are you talking about any tool in particular? podman / buildah / cri-o? Also, any Ubuntu version in particular?
DazEErR wrote 3 months ago
Hi, well in particular running podman containers with AA enabled, and I'm personally using Ubuntu 20.04. If you mean which tool generates AppArmour profiles I was on about this: https://github.com/containers/common/tree/main/pkg/apparmor. Warning not a dev only had a quick skim :)
lsm5 wrote 3 months ago
@sagrunert ^
sagrunert wrote 3 months ago
Podman on Ubuntu 20.04 builds with the apparmor tag. Can you please open an issue within the podman repository containing the requested outputs there? I think it would be better to track the issue there if there is some.
DazEErR wrote 2 months ago
Excuse my ignorance but I'm not that familiar with OBS. Where exactly should I open a bug report? EDIT: Never mind realised you meant containers/podman on GH.
srbala wrote 6 days ago
@lsm5 Please update podman to version
3.4.0lsm5 wrote 6 days ago
See: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:kubic:libcontainers#comment-1529213