File java-1_6_0-openjdk-rpmlintrc of Package java-1_6_0-openjdk

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File java-1_6_0-openjdk-rpmlintrc of Package java-1_6_0-openjdk (Revision e91874266fbd32cf3fd35949ed535e58)

Currently displaying revision e91874266fbd32cf3fd35949ed535e58 , Show latest

# This is correct, the devel means a Java compiler
addFilter("devel-dependency java-1_6_0-openjdk-devel")

# those patches are applied in %build phase after unpacking of openjdk
# this is a false positive
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch1")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch2")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch3")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch4")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch104")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch105")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch106")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch107")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch108")
addFilter("patch-not-applied Patch109")

# no need to fix this warning in demo package
addFilter("shared-lib-calls-exit .*demo")

# those files are intended to be modified
addFilter("non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile .*/security.*")

# in most of the cases it does not make any sense
# and openjdk spec is big, ugly and full of comments help me
# with merging with fc specs ;-)
addFilter("macro-in-comment")

# This is indented - bnc#530046
addFilter("unstripped-binary-or-object .*libjvm.so")

Places

File java-1_6_0-openjdk-rpmlintrc of Package java-1_6_0-openjdk (Revision e91874266fbd32cf3fd35949ed535e58)

Places