Overview
Request 1146858 superseded
Please consider the inclusion of the sequoia-sq CLI into Tumbleweed. Thank you!
- Created by ph03nix
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 1151899
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27
Request History
ph03nix created request
Please consider the inclusion of the sequoia-sq CLI into Tumbleweed. Thank you!
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
darix accepted review
Accepted review for by_group opensuse-review-team request 1146858 from user staging-bot
licensedigger accepted review
The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.
anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
anag+factory accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
anag+factory accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
anag+factory accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:27"
Thanks, I'll look into how to resolve this. My first through is to rename the binary it to
sequioia-sqFollowing https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909085 and having a quick look on ispell 3.4.06, where
sqis not build anymore, I'd argue thatsequoia-sqshould have preference over a package, which appears to be abandoned.sequioia-sq is also shipped as
sqin Fedora.So, I would appreciate to favor remaining consistent with upstream sequioia, Debian and Fedora and perhaps allow this conflict or remove sq from ispell, where it appears as not present anymore?
I'll bring this topic to the factory mailing list.
Contacted the ispell maintainer first.
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1147878 should resolve this issue.
Once ispell is accepted, this package will be automatically good to go
well:
If I create a Conflict section in the sequoia-sq spec file, would that resolve this conflict?
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1149547 should resolve this conflict.