Overview
Request 203573 revoked
- New subpackage dvb-devel, containing header files needed to build third-party DVB applications (bnc#832195)
- Improvements to femon (bnc#843473, bnc#843474)
- Created by jdelvare
- In state revoked
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
-
Open review for
factory-repo-checker
-
Open review for
legal-team
Request History
jdelvare created request
- New subpackage dvb-devel, containing header files needed to build third-party DVB applications (bnc#832195)
- Improvements to femon (bnc#843473, bnc#843474)
factory-auto added a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
factory-auto added a reviewer
Please review build success
licensedigger added a reviewer
{"delegate": "license change"}
licensedigger accepted review
{"delegate": "license change"}
scarabeus_factory declined request
There is conflict with another package.
Just Conflict: them in dependencies.
found conflict of dvb-1.1.1_20120913-35.1.x86_64 with nmh-1.3-20.2.x86_64:
- /usr/bin/scan
jdelvare revoked request
A Conflict: isn't the way to solve this. There's really no reason why dvb and nmh can't be installed together on the same system, they are completely unrelated tools.
I don't think either should be creating /usr/bin/scan, this name is way too generic. I'll rename it to dvbscan in dvb, this will solve the collision.
That being said, I believe the nmh package should be revisited entirely. It includes way too many short or generic binary names, /usr/bin/scan is just one of many. I'm reasonably certain that these should really not be in /usr/bin but rather in /usr/lib/nmh or /usr/libexec/nmh, to avoid namespace pollution.
