Overview
Request 559261 accepted
Since nobody else wants to fix the perl issue, I went ahead and added that patch too... I hope now this can move to TW; a fail since October is just not what I want to see for so-called maintained packagess
- Created by dimstar
- In state accepted
-
Package maintainer:
aeneas_jaissle
- Supersedes 554990
This does indeed not fix the build failure, but there seems to be multiple errors stacked up by now. Keep in mind that mozldap did not see a successful build in openSUSE:Factory since Oct 3rd, 2017 (since the upgrade of perl to 5.26)
The perl issue seems rather easy to be fixed:
Index: mozldap-6.0.7/c-sdk/ldap/build/replace.pm
===================================================================
--- mozldap-6.0.7.orig/c-sdk/ldap/build/replace.pm
+++ mozldap-6.0.7/c-sdk/ldap/build/replace.pm
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ sub GenerateHeader ($$\%) {
while(<TEMPLATE>) {
my $line = $_;
while(($orig, $replace) = each %$keywords) {
- $line =~ s/{{$orig}}/$replace/g;
+ $line =~ s/\{\{$orig\}\}/$replace/g;
}
# the first line is a comment specific to the template file, which we
But that only leads to the next error:
abandon.c:267:31: error: unknown type name 'LDAP'; did you mean 'LDAP_C'?
nsldapi_send_abandon_message( LDAP *ld, LDAPConn *lc, BerElement *ber,
^~~~
LDAP_C
Request History
dimstar created request
Since nobody else wants to fix the perl issue, I went ahead and added that patch too... I hope now this can move to TW; a fail since October is just not what I want to see for so-called maintained packagess
wrosenauer accepted review
wrosenauer approved review
wrosenauer accepted request
Thanks for your submission. I'm accepting on behalf of the package maintainer because it looks reasonable to me.
I cannot remember for sure but wasn't mozldap used in the 389ds chain? I think that was the reason it was added to the distribution. Or was it any other component depending on it? I'm just asking to find out if it is required at all still?
Nothing seems to depend on slapi-nis
But from the description of slapi-nis, 289-ds seems indeed the reason:
@aeneas_jaissle: review reminder
Any chance to get this accepted and forwarded to openSUSE:Factory? I know it was not building for a long time already - but with a fix prepared, there is little excuse to keep it failing much longer