Overview

Request 849055 accepted

No description set

Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

so the claim about 'Stuff as all packages should have been migrated.` is absolutely untrue


Jan Engelhardt's avatar

"should" has to meanings, one of which is "ought to". I'm all for the rpmlint's new errors. - build failures are the only time some people start reacting. ;-)


Franck Bui's avatar

Well "absolutely untrue" here sounds quite harsh given the fact that we (systemd maintainers) spent a lot of effort converting the 'lazy' packages in the past few years...

Indeed we still have to take care of aaa_base, insserv-compat (specially) but for the remaining ones (maybe 3 remaining packages really need to be fixed) we hoped that their respective maintainers could have helped.


Ludwig Nussel's avatar

@fbui


Franck Bui's avatar

weird I didn't get any notification from OBS :(

As we discussed with Ludwig, he'll take care of aaa_base and insserv-compat while I'll look at the other ones.

@dimstar, you already know the story about firebird, so don't expect it to be fixed the usual way ;)


Franck Bui's avatar

https://rpmlint.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Factory/x86_64/standard?rule=suse-deprecated-init-script

  • openstack-suse: given the fact that this package hasn't received any update during the last 5 years, is it still used/maintained or is it time to drop it ?

Neal Gompa's avatar

@fbui Please drop the policy for rcFOO links with this. There's no reason for them anymore and it's a crutch that makes people think you can get away with using old sysvinit-isms that aren't even cross-distro (it only ever existed in SUSE distributions).


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar
screen.x86_64: W: world-writable-unauthorized-file /run/uscreens
A world-writable file is installed by this package.         If the package is
intended for inclusion in any SUSE product please open a bug report to request
review of the package by the security team. Please refer to
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_security_guidelines#audit_bugs for
more     information.

Is that a known one for introducing this new fatal error?


Matthias Gerstner's avatar

Yes it is known (see bsc#1171879). It will be fixed once screen maintainers manage to submit their current devel project to Factory then I will whitelist it.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

CC @mlschroe and @Alexander_Naumov - that sounds like this request would be waiting for your screen submission


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

Waiting for "screen" fix

Request History
Alberto Planas Dominguez's avatar

aplanas created request


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer

Please review sources


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto accepted review

Check script succeeded


Ismail Dönmez's avatar

namtrac accepted review


Saul Goodman's avatar

licensedigger accepted review

ok


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A as a staging project

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A got accepted.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse approved review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A got accepted.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted request

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A got accepted.

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by