This request is superseded by
request 922958
(Show diff)
Overview
Request 922603 superseded
Switch to libalternatives
- Created by schubi2
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 919826
- Superseded by 922958
Loading...
Request History
schubi2 created request
Switch to libalternatives
bnavigator declined request
Please resubmit when an updated python-rpm-macros is in openSUSE:Factory and all rpmlint and build issues have been resolved.
I get
in my ~:python-rpm-macros. How come your build installs libalternatives into the build env without the proper
BuildRequires
?It's not very nice to submit packages which won't work in the target devel project.
Please wait until you have the proper requirments in Factory.
I have made the "mistake" that I have used one subproject for all python modules packages which I have changed and some of these packages have had the build requirement on alts. So it has been added to build. Sure if all changed modules are in factory the error would disappear after a while, but it is not good. So I will add it and test all packages again in an own subproject which include only the package which has to be tested and the new python-rpm-macros. Sadly the PR or OBS has not warned me, that it does not build on a "plain" build.
Don't get me wrong. I am not blocking your proposals just because I wouldn't like it. If it works, all is good. But IMHO the quality has to meet a certain standard.
In the meantime @mcepl accepted some of your SRs into d:l:p and made the packages unresolvable, because the updated (and unfinished) python-rpm-macros is not available.
It is absolutely OK :-) You are the expert here. I am thankful for each hint. I have done a patch for rmplint now and has asked the rmplint maintainer to have a look on it. So this should be solved. The funny part has been that rpmlint is producing rpmlint error while building by his own :-) Anyway I will take care about the missing BuildRequirments now and will submit the packages python-packages again.