It seems that the current firefox88 spec file contains a lot of ccache-related material, but the official build flag is missing from the mozilla project config. I'm wondering if this was done on purpose (and if so, why it's done this way). If not, perhaps we should be using the officially documented way of building with ccache?
Actually I never fully got the pros and cons and the interaction of ccache native and OBS. I'm following your mailthread but currently I could add a "metoo" to the questions. The ccache support in the packages was contributed by @MSirringhaus
Why is home:manfred-h:devel:languages:rust:rust-1.76 in the repositories config? sequoia-octopus-librnp fails to build for Tumbleweed, because it needs newer rust.
Comments 6
According to the OBS User Guide at https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.prjconfig.html#id-1.5.7.3.4.6.4.2.2.7 ccache support can be enabled per package by adding a build flag to the project config. For example:
BuildFlags: useccahe:firefox88
It seems that the current firefox88 spec file contains a lot of ccache-related material, but the official build flag is missing from the mozilla project config. I'm wondering if this was done on purpose (and if so, why it's done this way). If not, perhaps we should be using the officially documented way of building with ccache?
Actually I never fully got the pros and cons and the interaction of ccache native and OBS. I'm following your mailthread but currently I could add a "metoo" to the questions. The ccache support in the packages was contributed by @MSirringhaus
OK, let's see if anyone responds with advice.
Wolfgang, could you please add the repositories for Leap 15.6 to this project?
Hello, can someone enable openSUSE Leap 15.6, please?
Why is home:manfred-h:devel:languages:rust:rust-1.76 in the repositories config? sequoia-octopus-librnp fails to build for Tumbleweed, because it needs newer rust.