Overview
Request 459632 superseded
From packman
- Created by namtrac
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 477693
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85
Request History
namtrac created request
From packman
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:85/standard
licensedigger declined review
@coolo declined the legal report with the following comment: this is clearly LGPL not GPL
licensedigger declined request
@coolo declined the legal report with the following comment: this is clearly LGPL not GPL
superseded by 477693
Any special reason to not follow upstreams naming here? they call their package shine - so should we
shine-devel (providing pkgonfig(shine) and /usr/include/shine) - and libshine3 sounds absolutely fine. Together with a src package called shine
If it gets renamed, please Obsolete libshine-devel in case it is installed somewhere. mpc and vlc already use pkgconfig(shine), no need to adjust pkgs. Thanks.