Overview
Request 487539 superseded
Remove time stamps from html pages
- Created by plater
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 483144
- Superseded by 493160
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C
New cycle detected
- New cycle detected: ['ffado', 'gpgme', 'graphviz-plugins', 'jack', 'java-1_7_0-openjdk-bootstrap', 'java-1_8_0-openjdk', 'libbonoboui', 'libcanberra', 'libdbus-c++', 'libgnome', 'libgnomeui', 'libqt5-qtbase', 'lirc', 'portaudio', 'pulseaudio', 'timezone-java', 'tzdb', 'wget'] - New edges: [('libdbus-c++', 'graphviz-plugins')]
Request History
plater created request
Remove time stamps from html pages
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
maxlin_factory set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C"
maxlin_factory accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C
jengelh accepted review
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo multimedia:libs/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
maxlin_factory set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G"
maxlin_factory accepted review
Moved to openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G
dimstar_suse accepted review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse approved review
Removing from openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G, re-evaluation needed
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Requesting new staging review
maxlin_factory set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C"
maxlin_factory accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:C
Should I remove the documentation build completely? It seems to be more trouble than it's worth and via jack this package affects a lot of other packages.
I'd recommend to drop it at least from the main build. If you want we can investigate together on how to enable it in a 2nd build (by adding a 2nd .spec file to the package, just taking care of the doc). Those are the two options to break the cycle