Overview
Request 503728 revoked
mention dropped patch
- Created by StefanBruens
- In state revoked
- Supersedes 503723
-
Open review for
legal-auto
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:121
Request History
StefanBruens created request
mention dropped patch
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:104"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:104
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo electronics/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
dimstar_suse added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:121"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Moved to openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:121
jengelh declined review
libsigrok4 does not provide libsigrok.so.3, therefore must not obsolete libsigrok3.
jengelh declined request
libsigrok4 does not provide libsigrok.so.3, therefore must not obsolete libsigrok3.
StefanBruens reopened request
An obsolete is not a conflict, so obsoleting libsigrok3 is fine. Otherwise, the old package may not get uninstalled although it is no longer needed.
jengelh declined review
Uninstall is done by zypper dup/package description, you must not do it via Obsoletes.
jengelh declined request
Uninstall is done by zypper dup/package description, you must not do it via Obsoletes.
StefanBruens revoked request
Thats not documented anywhere, neither in https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_guidelines nor in https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Shared_library_packaging_policy
An Obsolete would defeat the main rationale from SLPP: "to allow for two or more (incompatible) versions of a shared library, such as libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2 to be" co-installable.