Overview
Request History
fstrba created request
Build against a plain java-devel provider instead of java-bootstrap-devel
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
Output of check script (non-fatal):
Unknown license 'Apache-1.1 AND Apache-2.0 AND GPL-1.0+ AND GPL-2.0 AND GPL-2.0-with-classpath-exception AND LGPL-2.0 AND MPL-1.0 AND MPL-1.1 AND SUSE-Public-Domain AND W3C'
Unknown license 'Apache-1.1 AND Apache-2.0 AND GPL-1.0+ AND GPL-2.0 AND GPL-2.0-with-classpath-exception AND LGPL-2.0 AND MPL-1.0 AND MPL-1.1 AND SUSE-Public-Domain AND W3C'
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:H
licensedigger accepted review
ok
repo-checker accepted review
cycle and install check passed
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
Just FYI: This was added back in the days because of private API being used which is/was not ABI stable
Yes, but the problem with the current state is that we might find ourselves by preferences to be building jdk8 using jdk8. In case that nss version changes, we get not installable package. There we clearly prefer to have a jdk8 that is having broken ssl support, but is able to bootstrap itself, to a non-installable package where we would have to clean binaries manually to get anything build again. But I have no religion about that.