Overview
Request 867167 accepted
- Created by aaronpuchert
- In state accepted
Request History
aaronpuchert created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
Output of check script (non-fatal):
Unknown license 'Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception'
Unknown license 'Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception'
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D"
dimstar accepted review
dimstar_suse accepted review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D got accepted.
dimstar_suse approved review
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D got accepted.
dimstar_suse accepted request
Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D got accepted.
And thus break ABI again, right? :)
Compared to the earlier 11.0.1 it does. Should I rather create a special sover? I'd probably need to look up how to do that though.
You would have to find the place where -Wl,-soname is used. But then: you can't just pick any other soname - some might clash with future llvm releases -, so some rules would need to be observed... I often found it easier to set LDFLAGS="-Wl,--version-script=x.sym" in these cases. See e.g. abseil-cpp, dwarves, libdlm.spec for example.