Overview
Request 952763 superseded
- Removed gzip as BuildRequires because OBS is handling this choice
internally and must never be handled in spec files
- Add gzip as BuildRequires, because have choice for gzip needed
by rpm-build: gzip zstd-gzip
- Update to 2.9.0b
- The project is now under the MIT license
- FTPS: support implicit TLS (new protocol: FTPSi)
- support MLSD
- fixed IPv6 support
- new option 'ip_version' (any/ipv4/ipv6) [default=any]
- fully implement rfc2428 (EPSV, EPRT)
- automatically determine when to use PRET (these features
are only used if the server explicitly supports them through
the FEAT response)
- fix crash with file transfers in active mode
- new option: gFTP->Preferences->Network -> IP Protocol
- Created by Kieltux
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 952842
- Open review for gnome-maintainers
Request History
Kieltux created request
- Removed gzip as BuildRequires because OBS is handling this choice
internally and must never be handled in spec files
- Add gzip as BuildRequires, because have choice for gzip needed
by rpm-build: gzip zstd-gzip
- Update to 2.9.0b
- The project is now under the MIT license
- FTPS: support implicit TLS (new protocol: FTPSi)
- support MLSD
- fixed IPv6 support
- new option 'ip_version' (any/ipv4/ipv6) [default=any]
- fully implement rfc2428 (EPSV, EPRT)
- automatically determine when to use PRET (these features
are only used if the server explicitly supports them through
the FEAT response)
- fix crash with file transfers in active mode
- new option: gFTP->Preferences->Network -> IP Protocol
gnome-review-bot accepted review
Check script succeeded
First of all, thank you @Kieltux for taking the time to update this package.
Now, some pointers:
There's no need for those additions in the changes file. Since your 2.9.0b version update hasn't been merged yet in GNOME:Apps, it's just unnecessary clutter.
Please, use
+
here for first level indentation to keep consistency. We never know if someday someone will need to use some scrip to parse the file. They should be:And for future reference, next time you need to change something in a package while updating it you can do it like this, for example:
You just add the packaging changes at the bottom, right after the upstream update changes 8^D
Thank you for your feedback and hints., Luciano. Will update the package and do a new request.
You're welcome :thumbs up:
Thank you. I am using SUSE Linux since SuSe Linux 6.2 (buy box with 6 CDs, 2 Diskettes and 4 paper manuals). Great distribution and great people.