google-noto-fonts

No description set
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename Size Changed Actions
Noto-hinted.zip 1159948133 1.08 GB almost 2 years
_constraints 0000000109 109 Bytes over 1 year
generate-specfile.sh 0000003621 3.54 KB 5 months
google-noto-fonts.changes 0000006186 6.04 KB 5 months
google-noto-fonts.spec 0000088790 86.7 KB 5 months
google-noto-fonts.spec.in 0000002050 2 KB 5 months
Comments for google-noto-fonts 4

Yunhe Guo's avatar

guoyunhebrave wrote almost 3 years ago

Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-


Jan Engelhardt's avatar

jengelh wrote almost 3 years ago

Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository


Yunhe Guo's avatar

guoyunhebrave wrote almost 3 years ago

If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.


Jan Engelhardt's avatar

jengelh wrote almost 3 years ago

I would agree.