Networking services and related tools
The project networking is intended for packages providing various networking services and related tools.
repository SLE_15 is for the latest service pack in SLE15.
repository SLE_12 is for the latest service pack in SLE12.
- 177 build errors
- 12 open requests ( 7 / 5 )
Refresh
| Name | Changed |
|---|
Comments 21
_nobody_ wrote
This comment has been deleted
darix wrote
This would mean duplicating the whole chromium code
mimi_vx wrote
And this is problem?
@ryanbach maybe network:chromium subproject or better new own network:brave
emendonca wrote
Could these packages be added as links here? The package "frr" needs them:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:libraries:c_c++/json-c https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:libraries:c_c++/libyang
EGDFree wrote
done
emendonca wrote
Thanks! One more is missing though: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:libraries:c_c++/rtrlib
olh wrote
What variant of json-c and libyang is required by frr? The specfile is not very specific about that. Both libs are already in the base distro.
computersalat wrote
may I please get a new project 'network:otobo' , a fork of otrs for the community. otrs 6 is EOL and no new version for community available in the near future.
rmax wrote
I am not sure the network project is the right home for high-level applications like this. I see that there are some of them packaged here (including OTRS) but IMO the purpose of the network project is to be a home for low-level networking tools and services rather than web applications that use networking rather than implementing some part of it.
Better candidates for hosting such web applications might be in the "Applications" or "server" hierarchies, but I see that there is also some unclear overlap between "network" and "server", so maybe we should define their scopes more clearly and then move packages to match that.
computersalat wrote
then I would vote for Application:ITS:otobo (ITS: Issue-Tracking-System)
rmax wrote
Sounds good to me, but I don't have the power to make it happen.
[update] But maybe Application:IssueTracker:otobo would be a more talking name. I woudn't have known immediately what ITS means.
thalunil wrote
We should enable a Leap 15.3 build target.
ecsos wrote
Yes it's time.
rmax wrote
Done, and 15.2 as well.
ecsos wrote
Thank you. :-)
alois wrote
How about adding Leap 15.4?
ecsos wrote
Isn't it already there?
alois wrote
Uhhh, missed it.
alois wrote
Although it could be renamed to openSUSE_Leap_15.4 for clarity.
ecsos wrote
I would like that too. But I don't burn my fingers on it anymore. Supposedly there was a vote that the new repos should only be 15.4. If that is desired someone else can do the renaming or it should be discussed where else.
lkocman-factory wrote
yes the 15.4 is intentional (see the common codestream name survery post on factory from previous year).