Overview
Request 346976 superseded
This package is built from prelink sources but contains just the
execstack binary. It can be used manipulate ELF binaries to run
with or without executable stack.
package created for dependencies that only need execstack while prelink do not build for all archis
- Created by michel_mno
- In state superseded
- Supersedes 346807
- Superseded by 347898
-
Open review for
factory-repo-checker
- Open review for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:34
Request History
michel_mno created request
This package is built from prelink sources but contains just the
execstack binary. It can be used manipulate ELF binaries to run
with or without executable stack.
package created for dependencies that only need execstack while prelink do not build for all archis
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger added legal-team as a reviewer
new_package: 0.5.0
licensedigger accepted review
babelworx accepted review
factory-repo-checker reopened review
Execution plan: devel:tools/openSUSE_Factory
found conflict of execstack-0.5.0-2.1.x86_64 with prelink-20130503-4.3.x86_64:
- /usr/bin/execstack
- /usr/share/man/man8/execstack.8.gz
mlin7442 added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:34 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:34"
mlin7442 accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:34
factory-repo-checker reopened review
found conflict of execstack-0.5.0-1.1.x86_64 with prelink-20130503-4.3.x86_64:
- /usr/bin/execstack
- /usr/share/man/man8/execstack.8.gz
mrdocs declined review
You package needs a Conflicts: prelink
Please fix the warnings in from rpmlint:
execstack.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
execstack.src:33: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
execstack.src:33: W: macro-in-comment %{shortcommit}
execstack.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
The way in rpm spec files to avoid this is:
#%% double %% the macros you want to comment.
Thanks! Please fix and we can accept. Seems useful.
mrdocs declined request
You package needs a Conflicts: prelink
Please fix the warnings in from rpmlint:
execstack.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
execstack.src:33: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
execstack.src:33: W: macro-in-comment %{shortcommit}
execstack.src:52: W: macro-in-comment %{commit}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
The way in rpm spec files to avoid this is:
#%% double %% the macros you want to comment.
Thanks! Please fix and we can accept. Seems useful.
