Overview
Request 445974 accepted
Update to KDE Applicatons 16.12.0
- Created by tittiatcoke
- In state accepted
- Supersedes 445845
Request History
tittiatcoke created request
Update to KDE Applicatons 16.12.0
licensedigger added legal-team as a reviewer
new_package: 16.12.0
licensedigger accepted review
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:G
factory-repo-checker reopened review
can't install kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64:
nothing provides libAvogadroCore.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64
nothing provides libAvogadroIO.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64
nothing provides libAvogadroQtGui.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64
nothing provides libAvogadroQtOpenGL.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64
nothing provides libAvogadroQtPlugins.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by kalzium-16.12.0-20.1.x86_64
babelworx accepted review
factory-repo-checker reopened review
can't install kdiagram-lang-2.6.0-5.3.noarch:
nothing provides kdiagram = 2.6.0 needed by kdiagram-lang-2.6.0-5.3.noarch
jengelh declined review
Please try to adjust the summary/description. It's not such a good idea I think to have multiple packages show "Base package of kdepim" (e.g. in yast2 package or zypper).
jengelh declined request
Please try to adjust the summary/description. It's not such a good idea I think to have multiple packages show "Base package of kdepim" (e.g. in yast2 package or zypper).
tittiatcoke reopened request
maybe later
mrdocs accepted review
I'm ok with this. It is not a funtional issue. Yes, descriptions need some love.
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo KDE:Applications/openSUSE_Factory_standard
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
@babelworx - had been reviewed in version 16.11.90 (RC) sr#444390
@jengelh you accepted the same description in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/444390
I'm fine with asking the team to update it - but declining it sounds unreasonably harsh in this case
It's possible that I missed it the first time (or rather, that it looked ok for the first package I looked at, and then only became suspicious with the 2nd.. 3rd.. SR.)