A KDE Photo Manager
digiKam is a simple digital photo management application for KDE, which
allows you to import and organize your digital photos easily. The
photos can be organized in albums, which can be sorted chronologically,
by directory layout, or by custom collections. An easy-to-use interface
that enables you to connect to your camera and preview, download, or
delete your images, is provided.
- Developed at KDE:Extra
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
6
derived packages
- Download package
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
|
0001-Revert-Exiv2-is-now-released-with-exported-ta |
0000010237 10 KB | 7 months |
| _constraints | 0000000110 110 Bytes | 3 months |
| digikam-7.1.0.tar.xz | 0593501044 566 MB | 5 months |
| digikam.changes | 0000146927 143 KB | 3 months |
| digikam.spec | 0000008278 8.08 KB | 3 months |
Comments for digikam 5
Kunda wrote almost 2 years ago
Please update to digiKam 6.0
wolfi323 wrote almost 2 years ago
It's on the way: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/679901
And JFYI: it's not always easy to do such a major version upgrade.
In this particular case, digikam 6.0 doesn't contain kipi-plugins anymore, but that's still used by other applications (spectacle, gwenview, kphotoalbum).
So we had to create a stand-alone kipi-plugins package first, and that had to go through legal review first where it was stuck for 11 days...
betamint wrote over 1 year ago
Today I tried to install digikam using zypper, but was surprised to find that it requires libKF5AkonadiContact5 (libKF5AkonadiContact.so.5), by requiring libdigikamcore6 (libdigikamcore.so.6.1.0).
After I told zypper to break the dependency on akonadi contact and installed digikam, it won't start, complaining "digikam: error while loading shared libraries: libKF5AkonadiContact.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory".
It seems not reasonable that digikam as a photo management software should "require" akonadi contact. Is it possible to make akonadi contact only a "recommend" or "suggest" of digikam?
cgiboudeaux wrote over 1 year ago
No.
Vogtinator wrote over 1 year ago
You need to raise that with the digikam authors. Currently if akonadi integration is enabled during buildtime, it's a hard runtime requirement as well.