Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API which is very similar to that of OpenGL.*

Edit Package Mesa

Mesa is a 3-D graphics library with an API which is very similar to
that of OpenGL.* To the extent that Mesa utilizes the OpenGL command
syntax or state machine, it is being used with authorization from
Silicon Graphics, Inc.(SGI). However, the author does not possess an
OpenGL license from SGI, and makes no claim that Mesa is in any way a
compatible replacement for OpenGL or associated with SGI. Those who
want a licensed implementation of OpenGL should contact a licensed
vendor.

Please do not refer to the library as MesaGL (for legal reasons). It's
just Mesa or The Mesa 3-D graphics library.

* OpenGL is a trademark of Silicon Graphics Incorporated.

Refresh
Refresh
Source Files (show merged sources derived from linked package)
Filename Size Changed
Mesa-rpmlintrc 0000000523 523 Bytes
Mesa.changes 0000313705 306 KB
Mesa.keyring 0000398858 390 KB
Mesa.spec 0000036886 36 KB
README.updates 0000000413 413 Bytes
U_clover-llvm-move-to-modern-pass-manager.patch 0000004642 4.53 KB
U_fix-mpeg1_2-decode-mesa-20.2.patch 0000000658 658 Bytes
_constraints 0000000569 569 Bytes
_multibuild 0000000056 56 Bytes
baselibs.conf 0000004614 4.51 KB
manual-pages.tar.bz2 0000137685 134 KB
mesa-23.2.0-rc4.tar.xz 0018844408 18 MB
mesa-23.2.0-rc4.tar.xz.sig 0000000119 119 Bytes
n_add-Mesa-headers-again.patch 0000000474 474 Bytes
n_drirc-disable-rgb10-for-chromium-on-amd.patch 0000001234 1.21 KB
n_stop-iris-flicker.patch 0000000983 983 Bytes
u_dep_xcb.patch 0000001165 1.14 KB
u_fix-build-on-ppc64le.patch 0000001560 1.52 KB
Comments 63

Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

Is there any chance to get the build for 13.2 fixed in this repository? There seems to be no unresolvable technical show stopper: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=home%3Aaevseev&package=Mesa


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Of course this would be possible despite openSUSE 13.2 will be out of support pretty soon. Seems you removed U_cso-don-t-release-sampler-states-that-are-bound.patch. Not sure why? For the additional patch fix-missing-memfd-header.patch, please follow our X11:XOrg patch guidelines. After resolving this you can open a submitrequest against X11:XOrg. Thanks!


Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

I did neither remove anything nor add any patch - you seem to mistake me for the maintainer of the repository I mentioned. My motivation for asking is simply not to let increase the number of repositories I use (currently 49 and counting) any further by adding another "home/" repository for packages at least theoretically already available in a repository in use.


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Indeed I assumed this would be your repository.


Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

Thanks for having revivified providing updated packages for 13.2.


Edison Alvarez's avatar

alvarex wrote

will this bump to version 17.1?



Bernd Lachner's avatar

blachner wrote

Could the build be enabled for openSUSE Leap 42.3 to get a Mesa 18 version for this distribution?


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Currently it's not possible, since llvm cannot be built for openSUSE 42.3. :-(


Bernd Lachner's avatar

blachner wrote

OK. Thank you for your answer.

Do you think it would be possible to build it anytime soon for openSUSE Leap 42.3? Or will it stay at the current offered Mesa version for this distribution?


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

I can't say. A collegue is/was working on this. But it has no high priority.


Ondřej Súkup's avatar

mimi_vx wrote

probably not, Newer versions of Mesa also need new version of Wayland libs and protocols. + Bonus six months after the release of Leap 15.0, 42.3 Leap will EOL


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Ok. Build against Leap 42.3 is enabled in X11:XOrg again. Looks good so far.


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

On my TODO list ...


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Looks like this came in with some autocommit magic crap back from factory. :-(


r773 | buildservice-autocommit | 2018-09-18 09:37:23 | 0273904b5d3bac6a229ef7bd5bf12077 | unknown | rq635013

baserev update by copy to link target

r772 | buildservice-autocommit | 2018-09-11 15:12:48 | 04666deac08cb6669a4cfb681e18d754 | unknown | rq631796

baserev update by copy to link target

Fortunately Tobias Klausmann brought this back, now to 18.2.1 ...


Damian Zaręba's avatar

KhazAkar wrote

Please add GALLIUM_HUD support for intel drivers


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Intel drivers aren't using gallium at the moment. Not sure what you mean here.


Guillaume GARDET's avatar

Guillaume_G wrote

Please check/fix %arm and aarch64 before pushing to Factory


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

@ryanbach Already checked in ... :-)


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted



Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks. Sounds good! An appropriate submitrequest would be appreciated and accepted. ;-)


Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

Is the current (2020-01-09) state of Mesa in this repo supposed to work? There's a mixture of 19.3.1 (e.g. Mesa) and 19.2.6 (e.g. Mesa-dri) packages online - I had to go back to Leap 15.1's Mesa 18.3.2 to get the GUI up and running …


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks. Indeed build of Mesa-driver on Leap 15.1/15.2 fails due to llvm version < 8. I'm trying to build llvm8 for Leap 15.1/15.2. Will take some time though ...


Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

No need to hurry (at least not because of me). Just wanted to know if I broke something on my side or if the repo's the one to blame … ;)


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

It has been the Mesa update to 19.3.1 .... which now needs llvm 8 ...


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

@akilgus Meanwhile build against Leap 15.0/15.1 fixed. :-)


Andreas Kilgus's avatar

akilgus wrote

Thanks for your work. I'll give the new packages a try within the coming days.


Anonymous User's avatar

_nobody_ wrote

This comment has been deleted


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Already on my TODO list. ;-)


Aaron Dominick's avatar

zakhrov wrote

Can we enable the MESA_VK_DEVICE_SELECT layer and the Mesa Vulkan Overlay layer for the Tumbleweed package?


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Hmm. Could you come up with a concrete proposal for the package, preferrably a submit request? My guess is that I need to add -Dvulkan-device-select-layer=true as option for meson in specfile, but since you're apparently an expert here, it would be good if you could come up with something well tested.


Aaron Dominick's avatar

zakhrov wrote

I have branched the package and tried out some changes. They are in my obs repository here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:zakhrov:Mesa/Mesa It adds 2 packages. Mesa-vulkan-overlay and Mesa-vulkan-device-select which has the libraries and JSON files


Aaron Dominick's avatar

zakhrov wrote

I have submitted a request for it


Aaron Stern's avatar

ukbeast89 wrote

I've tried updating to 21.0.1. meson.build:21:0: ERROR: Value classic is not boolean (true or false)


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Valid values for -Dosmesa have changed. And a lot more. Mesa update won't be trivial this time. I tried for about two hours, but gave up then. May take several days to update Mesa this time. :-(


Aaron Stern's avatar

ukbeast89 wrote

-Dosmesa=classic \ is no longer being used. Removed that option and now notice ERROR: Options "swrast" are not in allowed choices: "auto, i915, i965, r100, r200, nouveau"

Looks like mesa has removed it https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Mesa-Kills-SWRAST


Florian's avatar

sp1rit wrote

n_drirc-disable-rgb10-for-chromium-on-amd.patch is unneeded as it got fixed in gstreamer a few months ago:

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer-vaapi/-/merge_requests/410


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks. Done. See my latest changelog entry for Mesa sources.


Behzad A's avatar

BehzadA wrote

The Crocus driver(Intel 965G(Gen4)-Haswell(Gen7.5 and also Cherryview) Gallium-based driver) has been forgotten in the Spec files.

//-----------------------------------------

%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64

-Ddri-drivers=i915,i965,nouveau,r100,r200 \

-Dgallium-drivers=r300,r600,radeonsi,nouveau,swrast,svga,virgl,iris,crocus \

//------------------------------------------

Currently, the Crocus isn't enabled by default in Mesa 21.2

//------------------------------------------

mesa/meson_options.txt

option( 'prefer-crocus', type : 'boolean', value : false, description : 'Prefer new crocus driver over older i965 driver for gen4-7' )

//---------------------------------------

And users who want to use the Crocus driver should set the 'MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=crocus' environment variable, And if there is a problem with video hardware acceleration(vaapi driver), Should set the 'LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=i965'


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Enabled. But currently build on %ix86 fails. This is the bigger issue right now.


Behzad A's avatar

BehzadA wrote

Thanks

I'm not a Mesa contributor, But I took a quick look and personally suspected GCC11.x(This is just a guess) because build with GCC7.x is successful(Leap_15.2 Mesa) but fails with GCC11.x, And also I remembered some opened issues on Mesa Gitlab that seems to be related to the GCC11

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5069 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5067 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/5068


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks. I'm just wondering why Mesa 21.1.6 can still be built on %ix86 with GCC11 in place. So it needs to be related to changes in Mesa 21.2.0.


Behzad A's avatar

BehzadA wrote

The issue seems to be solved; Please checks Spec and conf files in my branch. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:BehzadA:branches:X11:XOrg/Mesa Based on https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:tobijk:X11:XOrg:Unstable/Mesa Modified by me and need to be reviewed and also "Mesa-dri-kmsro" build is enabled.


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks! I've fixed the build against %ix86 now by removing "-flto=auto" from cpp flags.


Behzad A's avatar

BehzadA wrote

The i915g driver(Intel Gen3 Gallium-based driver) has been forgotten in the Spec files.

%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64

-Ddri-drivers= \

-Dgallium-drivers=r300,r600,radeonsi,nouveau,swrast,svga,virgl,iris,crocus,i915 \


Behzad A's avatar

BehzadA wrote

Also to support legacy platforms that only have classic drivers and Swrast driver

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/10557 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8069/


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

I'm not aware of an (open)SUSE platform, which only supported classic drivers and swrast drivers. I don't want to readd no longer upstream supported classic drivers.


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

I wasn't aware of the i915 Gallium driver for Intel Gen3 GPUs. I'll try to add it.


Xu Zhao's avatar

nuklly wrote

Can we enable zink driver in this repo?


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Just accepted your submit request. :-)



Daniel Galko's avatar

DGalo wrote

Hello, mesa 23.1 was released 13 days ago https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-announce/2023-May/000720.html


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

I tried updating to it, but build fails. https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:sndirsch:branches:X11:XOrg


Andreas Schneider's avatar

gladiac wrote

  • There should be a check that data is not NULL as memcpy can't deal with NULL pointers.
  • this->value is a union. You might want to use &this->value.u64 instead. The compiler should understand it then.

Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks @gladiac. Hmm, could you be a bit more code specific?


Aaron Stern's avatar

ukbeast89 wrote

@sndirsch

I posted a diff from the latest successful build from home:X0F:HSF. https://pastebin.com/AzR8pwja Massive differences between the 2 spec files.


Stefan Dirsch's avatar

sndirsch wrote

Thanks @kbeast89. Unfortunately these are radical changes I cannot apply. Any chance you limit this to the change, which just fixes the build in X11:XOrg?


llyyr's avatar

llyyr wrote

You need to build Mesa-drivers with -Dshader-cache=enabled and Mesa with -Dxlib-lease=enabled, that should allow a successful build. Also recommend -Dallow-kcmp=enabled for both packages, to avoid some scary messages when comparing fds.

Check https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:llyyr:branches:home:sndirsch:branches:X11:XOrg/Mesa (currently it's failing because there's no gbm.h to remove after successful build but that should be an easy fix)

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by